Dear Professor Segun Ogungbemi,
Of course I am and was aware that you are from the North as that's the first surprising point that you made in the letter that I referred to, in which you said,
"I am from the north and it is not true that the north can boast of holding to power at the centre as stated by Prof. Abdullahi."
I was initially surprised because both your names, your first name Segun and your surname Ogungbemi are unmistakably Yoruba names and even after having made the probable location of your birth clear (Kwarra?) I still concluded that you are a Yoruba man just like me - no matter from what part of the Diaspora you shed your first tears or whether or not your umbilical cord is buried in the Sokoto, Borno or the more liberal Kaduna area.
But jokes aside that's one of the problems of Nigeria's and indeed Africa's regional and tribal politics: you may be born, bred and buried in the North alright but your name proclaims you Yoruba. So which bona fide Hausa man is going to take your self-proclaimed Northern identity, seriously, just because you maybe grew up in that environment? It certainly didn't save the Igbo traders, many of whom were born and bred in the North when the pogroms against the Igbo were perpetrated just prior to Biafra seceding as a safe haven for the Igbo people!
Of course, my dear professor, there's no doubt that you are eminently, even pre-eminently qualified to contest the presidential elections as a Northerner who would also sweep the Yoruba vote – there's no doubt about that, however, sweeping the Igbo vote with a name like that, would be quite another matter – as the South of Nigeria is divided between the South West and the South East, literary feuds Soyinka & supporters vs. The ascended Achebe & his fans, whilst in politics proper it's eternally AWO vs. ZIK – has always been – to the extent that we can quote imperial Kipling symbolically, that
You asked "Is democracy based on rotation?"
In my view, acceding to the rotation role playing politics in Nigeria is in the national interest of peace & prosperity and to allay both the fear and lessen the ever increasing tensions based on a perceived imbalance between the North and the South in terms of development, education, and that this perceived injustice that's the main cause of the abject poverty in the North will be more easily righted by a Northern president. Nor do I think that the rotation system agreed upon by the PDP as an internal matter, a compromise of understanding, is in any way "undemocratic"
So, I am making a point in favour of – at this time - anointing a Northern as the presidential candidate for the PDP, most likely with a Southern running mate.
It's easy to see without looking too far that if that does not happen then Goodluck Jonathan's next logical option will be to retire a few more Northern Generals in the Nigerian military, to pre-empt a coup. Of course, this is standard practice: In their time, Babangida and Abacha played it safe by retiring scores of Yoruba generals and other Yoruba top military brass.
As to the question of whether or not a Northern president will uplift the North, here is your answer below, but your answer does not solve the perceived injustice or the current poverty in the North – or take away the North's motivation to capture/ re-capture the presidency.
Your views on this:
"The educational backwardness of the north as it is known today is not the kind that anyone can be proud of. You don't have to have a northerner as president to make life better for all northerners. Any Nigerian who becomes president of the country can do that. Let the leadership of the north since 1966-2013 show the scorecards of their achievements. For 38 years the north had ruled this country and nothing to show for it, particularly in the north. What have the masses gained from the period they had ruled the country? I think that should be what Ango ought to be concerned about and not that the north will hold on to power come 2015 as long as they want on the basis of their numerical voting power.
Obasanjo was in power for 11 years altogether as military head of state and civilian president of Nigeria. Were the Yoruba better off than when Yar'Adua was President of Nigeria? The Yoruba will tell you that they were worse off under the leadership of their kinsman."
You are surely overlooking the patronage that a Yoruba would receive when his kinsman is in power, ditto for the Hausa, the Fulani and of course the Igbo, and therefore, all the more reason for them to fight for their folks to be at the helm of the big business, so that at least a few kobo, more than a dollar a day should trickle down.
In one of his interviews Muhammadu Buhari talks about the elite and later on goes on to identify himself with that elite. This suggests to me that a Northern candidate usually comes from the elite – others say that "the Kaduna mafia" is part of it.
My impression is that Goodluck Jonathan is not from "the elite" – if anything is very much from the grassroots albeit nothing like my old icon, Michael Imoudu. You ask yourself the question, is Goodluck Jonathan the best that the system was able to deliver to Nigeria?
Finally, this democracy business (crazy-demo Fela calls it) by which the winner takes all – as happened in Egypt where the losers wanted to "share" power. In Nigerian terms Id' say that the losers also want "their share"
Please excuse some of my stray observations.
Yours sin-cerely,
dreary Cornelius
http://www.thelocal.se/blogs/corneliushamelberg/
--Drear Cornelius,Thanks for making reference to me in this debate. You said and I quote,..."since the North insists that it's their turn according to a rotation system agreed upon, and Prof. Segun Ogungbemi's misgivings about the matters notwithstanding,(he sounds as if there's no one from the North that's qualified to be president of Nigeria."I think you misunderstood me. First, I am from the North and there are many more people like me who are well qualified to be elected president of this country from the region. Therefore, your insinuation is incorrect. Secondly, My view is that rotational presidency is a PDP internal arrangement within the party which is not in our constitution. The demerit of it all is that it promotes disunity rather than unity which is what we are witnessing today.From the foregoing therefore, my proposal is that the best way to secure unity in Nigerian politics is to elect anyone who is mostly suited for the job regardless which ethnic group s/he comes from in Nigeria. That will foster unity and promote enduring and genuine democracy. In other words, it will be seen to be constitutional and authentically democratic.Of course, you have every right to think that Buhari is suitable for job but it should not be based on where he comes from. And more importantly the electorate is to make that decision at the polls.Merit and the electorate not any rotation should be the basis of our guide for the choice we make.Segun Ogungbemi.
Sent from my iPhone
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "USA-Africa Dialogue Series" moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin.
For current archives, visit http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
For previous archives, visit http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue-
unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.