Quantcast
Channel: Dialogues
Viewing all 53856 articles
Browse latest View live

SV: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: REVISITING PROFESSOR CHRIS IMAFIDON'S CLAIM TO OXFORD PROFESSORSHIP

$
0
0

Mr. Kayode J. Fakinlede, this discourse originated from the expressed anger of some of our learned Professors over what they assumed to be false claim to academic achievements by certain named Nigerians. These supposedly false claimants to academic achievements, hold no position in the Ministries, Departments and Agencies in Nigeria except one who is a mathematics lecturer in one of our Universities. The mathematics lecturer actually submitted a paper to a US-based Clay Mathematics Institute in which he believed to have solved the Riemann Hypothesis. Submission of the paper by the lecturer does not constitute false claim even if the US-based Clay Mathematics Institute are to consider his solution faulty. Should we accept that those named are guilty of false academic achievements, Nigeria as a country has not suffered any damage as a result of their false claims. On the contrary, I consider all our qualified academics in the Ministries, Departments and Agencies who have failed to deliver required products from their offices as holders of false academic degrees. After enumerating some of the products that Western educated Nigerians in Nigeria's MDA have failed to deliver, I concluded, as you rightly quoted, that 'even though they have been certified (or is it authenticated?) as experts by the white man in their respective fields..' You took exception to my conclusion, yet you narrated your early sojourn in America while searching for work and the employer asked, "What can you do?" You explained the employer's query thus, "He wanted to know what I was qualified todo. I had only a certificate telling him that I was eminently educated. However, he wanted to know if I could type, drive, operate a forklift, or something. I was not qualified for anything in the technologically built economic system. I was, therefore, thrown into the lowest rung of the economic ladder - as a messenger." If, according to your narration, your certificate had testified that you could type, drive or operate a forklift, the employer would have employed you direct and it would have been your responsibility to prove what your certificate attested to that you could do. If you failed to live up to what your certificate claimed you could do, you would be sacked in addition to being investigated if your certificate is genuine, borrowed or purchased. If you juxtapose what your American employer wanted to establish with your educational qualification, with that of Nigerian academics employed, appointed, selected or elected in various capacities in the MDAs you will see that they were given those jobs on the ground that their certificates certified them as being able to deliver what is required from their respective offices. A professor of electricity in charge of Nigeria's power supply with adequately funded budget that produces and generates constant darkness must certainly, according to the result, be a fake professor of electricity. Another example is that of Nigeria's four refineries designed with capacity to refine 445,000 barrel of crude oil per day. Nigeria's daily consumption of crude oil when refined per day is said to be 408,000 barrel per day which means an excess of 37,000 barrel per day and Nigerians will not need to sleep at the petrol station to buy petrol. Thus, if the refineries function as they should, the pump maximum price of petrol in Nigeria would be N45 per litre. If you don't know, Nigeria's Oil Industry and its subsidiaries are managed by Nigerians with sophisticated academic qualifications in chemical engineering and specialists in oil refineries. Those that claim possessions of knowledge of what we need to produce by virtue of their certificates have been given the chance to demonstrate their knowledge and resultant productions have been zero. The zero or negative production in all Nigeria's MDAs where academically qualified Nigerians are employed is total and as such, their qualifications should be regarded as fake.


A graduate from an American university or even from any country living in America, is not being asked to generate or distribute electricity for a country or asked to manufacture a pin - K.J. Fakinlede  I don't think any American will, just because he/she is a graduate in English language, seek employment in a company where the main business is to generate and distribute electricity. Water should find its level in the jar. It is not question of asking the non-electricity educated American graduate to produce and distribute electricity, he /she should know that when a person that would carry baby on the back is required a person with hunch-back should not apply. America is not a country where people believe that big grammar on darkness will bring light!!

Americans have been building economies based on technology for at least two millennia. The modern industrial sector in America started with the arrival of the Europeans on American soil - K. J. Fakinlede  

What today is known as USA is a child of Britain that outgrew his mother. Leo Huberman narrated how Industrial Revolution got to America thus, "From 1765 to 1789 a series of strict laws was passed by Parliament. The new machines, or plans or models of them, must not be exported from the country ... skilled men who worked the machines were not to leave England  ... under penalty of a heavy fine and imprisonment. England alone was to benefit from the new machinery; England was to become the workshop of the world. ...//... To the United States secretly, in 1789, came Samuel Slater, formerly a worker in English factories. He carried plans of the new machinery - in his mind. At Pawtucket, Rhode Island, he set up the first complete mill for spinning yarn on the Arkwright plan; the machines he designed and constructed from memory. The Industrial Revolution was thus brought to America (p.146, We, the People -THE DRAMA OF AMERICA)." Up till today, even when there are patents to protect new technical inventions and scientific discoveries, there are often court litigations among Europeans and between Europeans and Americans over ownership of new inventions and discoveries. Besides they have industrial spies operating in each others country. When we see how they compete with one another over how to prey on us, we must think if the Western Education they give to us is with good intention and for our own good. When the US was planning to become an imperialist state after World War I, she allowed some Africans, especially from Ghana and Nigeria to study in American Universities. At the same time, Black Americans suffered discrimination at all levels of life, including rights to quality education. It was as Edgar Furness expressed it in the History of the poor, "Given education to the children of the lower class of the society would make them contemn those drudgeries for which they were born (p. 148)." In 1963, when the Governor of Alabama was blocking Black Americans from attending the same University as White Americans, in spite of the Supreme Court's decision that the discrimination was unconstitutional, Nigeria was invaded by the US government sponsored 'American Peace Corps' to teach in our schools. The purpose of giving Western Education to us, therefore, is to colonise us economically and mentally. In practice Western education converts us to trained dogs that always swerve tail in readiness to obey any command from our Western World masters no matter how dangerous the command is to our wellbeing..


With regard to your assertion that the 'Americans have been building economies based on technology for at least two millennia, I noticed that, in response to an undisclosed commentator, you have explained that you did not mean that it should take as long as two millennia before Nigeria can develop technologically. That stand would imply that those of us demanding technological and industrial development now are too in haste. If that interpretation of your view is correct, you are not the first to hold such view. When Nigeria's MDAs dominated by Nigerian Engineers, Scientists and Economic Gurus were blamed for lack of industrial and economic progress in 1980, their response was that Rome was not built in a day and Nigerians should not expect them to do in 20 years what took Europe 100 years to accomplish. If it is Rome the officials at Nigeria's MDAs want to build for Nigerians, the prototype is there for them to copy and moreover their academic qualifications are far more superior than the builders of Rome. By virtue of their academic qualifications, building Nigeria to a Rome should be faster.


There should be correlation between the quantities of certified Engineers, Scientists and Economics in a country and its industrial and economic development. Those that the gods will make slaves must first be disorganised. Nigerians are disorganised, they cannot organise even for a day, not to talk of future. In 1948, Britain seized many cows in Nigeria and transferred them to Britain. In spite of the fact that the climate was not conducive to nurturing and breeding cows, their veterinary and agricultural scientists, saw to it that the cows were acclimatised to become source of beef supplies and dairy products for the British people. All cows in Europe originated from Africa. In 2018, Nigeria's arm-chair veterinary and agricultural scientists are still at the age of preserving nomadic pastoralists and their constitutional rights to, indiscriminately, graze around the country. Spaghetti and Macaroni became Italian food and spread to the rest of Europe after Marco Polo took the wheat food with him from China to Italy in 1295. Similarly, Potato became a staple food in Europe, after Christopher Columbus took it from American Indians to Europe. I am not certain if Marco Polo or Christopher Columbus had any academic degree but they have impacted positively in the lives of the people of their countries and Europe. Somewhere else you said that Nigerians believe that Government should do/own everything. That is not true. Nigeria has privatised nearly all state's owned properties among which is electricity. You may wish to remember that privatisation of state's owned companies in the Western World commenced during the era of President Ronald Reagan of USA and Prime Minister of Britain, Margaret Thatcher. The privatised companies were functioning and producing profitably. In Nigeria the state owned companies mal-functioned and it was believed that they would function better if they were privatised. Those who ran down the state owned companies bought them up during privatisation and are still running them in the same way as before privatisation, e.g. electricity: Generating Company of Nigeria (GENCO) and Distributing Company of Nigeria (DISCO). Here I have to repeat what I said earlier that if a person is employed and remunerated to generate and distribute electricity because his certificate portrays him as capable of performing that duty but at the end he failed to perform, the only reasonable conclusion must be that his certificate is fake or he is graduate from ISI EWU UNIVERSITY.

S. Kadiri

   
 




Från: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> för Kayode J. Fakinlede <jfakinlede@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 15 januari 2018 03:17
Till: USA Africa Dialogue Series
Ämne: SV: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: REVISITING PROFESSOR CHRIS IMAFIDON'S CLAIM TO OXFORD PROFESSORSHIP
 
"Western educated Nigerians in our MDAs cannot, generate and distribute electricity, pump potable water, mine iron ore and work it into steel, refine crude oil, construct motor-able roads, and etc., even though they have  been certified (or is it authenticated?) as experts by the white man in their respective fields...." S. Kadri

I sympathise with some of the issues raised by Mr. Kadri in this article.  However, I take exception with the issue of the lack of performance of our Western educated Nigerians or Nigerians who have attended universities and obtained high degrees.
Having worked in American industries in various capacities for at least thirty years and in the industrial sector for close to four decades, I am in position to evaluate the issues bedeviling the industrial sector and the technological sector in Nigeria as a whole
The simple fact is that the European and by a logical extension, Americans have been building economies based on technology for at least two millenia. The modern industrial sector in America  started with the arrival of the Europeans on American soil.
A graduate from an American university or even from any country living in America, is not being asked to generate and distribute electricity for a country of asked to manufacture even a pin. He is merely a cog and a minusule one in the wheel of an already smooth running electricity company, if he is employed there, or for that matter a supervsor in a company where pins are manufactured. That is the reason why, Nigerian graduates, coming to America, are able to fit effortlessly into the technologically advanced system.
"What can you do?"  The employement agent asked me many years ago on my arrival to America. He wanted to know what I was qualified to do. I had only a certificate telling him that I was eminently educated. However, he wanted to know if I could type, drive, operate a forklift, or something. I was not qualified for anything in the technologically built economic system. I was therefore thrown into the lowest rung of the economic ladder – as a messenger.
Granted, I quickly climbed my way out of that position by taking advantage of the training and education system, I could imagine a Nigerian graduate from a Nigerian university being asked to go run a petroleum company or even manufacture a car. He does not have the qualification AND he does not exist within an economic system that would make gaining the experience possible. There is simply no technologically constructed economic system yet.
Now, Is that the reason why he cannot manufacture even a pin? Sadly, that is the reason. The technology involved in manufacturing a pin is not much far removed from that involved in manyfacturing a large airliner.
The process in achieveing a technologically oriented economy lies not in castigating our graduates. While teaching in a Nigerian technological university, I was able to empathize with many of our students and their lecturers. While these people do not lack in intelligence, they are definitely not equipped to become masters of industry. I also know that this is not just a case of importing the most modern equipment to teach the students. The simple fact is that there is no support system to make things happen yet.
We are most quick as Nigerians to blame things on government. Yes, our governments are much culpable in our development technologically. But their culpabilitity stems more from ignorance than wilfull malice. They simply do not know what to do.
African economies today are faced with more than a double whammy. The budding middle class, whom they managed to educate with meager resources are, like moths that are attracted by light, departing the continent in droves to the already built economies. And for most, there is no turning back. They can sympathize, empathize or 'feel'  for their countries of origin, there is however nothing that can replace their actual presence in their countries, helping in the building of the economy. This understandably is a difficult proposition for most who have managed to escape the harsh realities of living in Africa.
Nevertheless, from now, it is incumbent on all of us to begin to figure out how we can develop our individual countries.The issue of perpetual analysis often lead to paralysis, considering the myriads of issues definable.
Enough of sending money home to build palaces that we will never live in but which are mainly aimed at stoking our egos. Enough of incessant analysis. We are beginning to speak English, French, Spanish etc. better that their native speakers. We compete and glorify on irrelevancies
Our main question, going forward must be 'HOW CAN I HELP IN MY AREA OF INTEREST?' That area is then defined by us and we start working at it. That is how the Europeans and Americans built the aforementioned technologially, industrially sophisticated economies we gravitate towards.
As a conclusion, I must confess, we talk too much!!

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com 
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue

groups.google.com
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.



Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

groups.google.com
Google Groups allows you to create and participate in online forums and email-based groups with a rich experience for community conversations.




Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Grazeland Grab (Poem)

$
0
0

Almost like putting a questionable  value  lives of the Fulani herdsmen killed, in response to the report of Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows, such a horrendous national tragedy, sitting there in luxury and comfort in Lagos, far from the scene of the crime,  in the name of all the dead and injured, you honestly  want us to  believe - to  take your word as true that, "The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie." ? Could you care to give us an accurate body count?


Secondly, your  talk of  "Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria" Do you feel that  this is the public place for you to wilfully slander and vilify the Venerable Emir of Kano because you regard him as a non-political figure? He certainly has a large following.


As to appetite for beef. Maybe something for you to agree with: Cemeteries.  From the  GBS Vg point of view : Graveyards


Adios amigo...



On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 22:23:32 UTC+1, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie.

This strategy of lying is standard when the Fulani terrorists  want to justify their massacres of innocent populations in the face of national outcries over such barbarism.

This particular lie has been mutating since it was introduced by Sanusi lamido Sanusi to justify/ excuse the recent massacre in Benue by Fulani terrosts

Identifying himself as a patron of the Miyetti Allah/MACBAN,, the Fulani cattle herder's  association at the heart of this crisis, he claimed 800  Fulani were killed in Taraba and that he furnished the govt with the information, but the govt did nothing.

The Taraba state govt and  CAN Taraba promptly called him out on his lie.

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria, the man who, immediately he became  CBN governor enacted controversial sweeping changes that destroyed some banks and led executives like Cecilia Ibru to forfeit huge assets including their banks, the same man who practically ran a parallel govt as CBN governor, making regular public pronouncements as to how the country is or should be run in terms of structural changes to the system, so much so he was being touted as Presidential material, the man who fought then President GEJ to a standstill , the man who told the President publicly that the President could not remove him when the President asked him to resign over allegations of conniving with the political opposition, the person, who, for the first time perhaps in the CBN's history, dished out huge sums of money, largely to Northern Muslim states, and particularly Kano, defending that as corporate social responsibility when he was challenged,   the same person whom GEJ could remove only by suspending him when he was out of the country, the President claiming he was being investigated for his management of bank finances,  the same man who survived that political defeat by being made made Emir of the same Kano to which he had donated such huge sums, his coronation possibly upstaging an anticipated heir, the son of the immediate past Emir,  the same Sanusi, who, as Emir, rocked the Northern Muslim establishment by repeatedly, loudly  and radically advocating drastic reforms in the  Northern Muslim social system  which he described as backwardly medieval, only to be silenced through concerted blackmail in which he was reminded of the dethronement of his father as emir even as a probe into his use of the Emirates finances was announced as about to be instituted,  an initiative that was dropped after it was clear Sanusi had got the message, following which he was cured of his  reformist aspirations,  the same corporately suave, internationally visible central bank governor and outspoken royal leader Sanusi  could not call even a press conference with the Nigerian media talk less adding the international media to report to the world and demand justice for a grievous act of such massive proportions as the massacre of 800 of his people in the face of the rising profile of Fulani as greedily bloodthirsty people and desperately cunning  land grabbers following  Fulani generated massacres leading almost a year ago to  Ekiti state anti-open grazing law and a recently instituted similar law in Benue but emerges with this story after the outburst of national horror following the savagery of what is being described as the latest round of Fulani generated ethnic cleansing in Benue even as the Fulani President of Nigeria looks on in tacit support that includes never apprehending, talk less prosecuting his kinsmen as they publicly call press conferences to justify their actions after each new massacre?

Haba!

Impunity can be taken only so far.

After some time, it becomes madness.

The same goes for this kangaroo revision of the Sanusi introduced strategy narrative by Benue MACBAN.

These are people whom the entire country has steadily become restive about on account of the escalation of their terrorist activity after their kinsman, Muhammadu Buhari, became President, ceding the leadership of all the nation's security services to his kinsmen, services that arrest only people who try to protect themselves from the nation wide scourge of the Fulani militia's successive massacres, from the Middle Belt to the South East.

Ekiti state governor Ayodele Fayose boldly instituted an anti-open grazing law and created an armed policing unit to enforce it, open grazing being a primary vehicle for individual and group terrorism by either violent herdsmen or the sophisticatedly  armed militia associated with them, their military wing who carry out massacres across the nation.  The terrorists have since left Ekiti state alone bcs Fayose is a very dangerous foe and the SW is increasingly mobilising agst the APC coalition that brought Buhari to power, it now being clear that they have been betrayed by Buhari's faction in the APC, the recent inauguration of Gani Adams with his militant credentials as Are Ona Kakanfo, war leader of Yorubaland, sending a strong signal about the orientation of Yorubaland in the current stormy times.

Facing the recurrent massacres by Fulani militia in Benue, after an extensive consultation process with various stakeholders   lasting weeks if not months, the Benue state government banned  open grazing. MACBAN kicked agst he law, vowing to continue business as usual and publicly summoned Fulani to converge in Benue, following which they massacred large numbers, men, women and children in Benue, in the most gruesome manner, later openly justifying the murders, vowing to resist all anti-open grazing laws.

As outrage rises, they manufacture new stories of justification.

In the midst of this hell of state sponsored terrorism, the aggressors are claiming that they lost 1,000 persons and 2 millions cows to Benue militia before the recent massacre by their own Fulani militia, and they kept quiet, raised no alarm, called no press conference to demonstrate how they were being massacred  even though people have been describing them as bloodthirsty landgrabbing aggressors, but are now calling one to make this allegation?

Haba!

The Greeks state 'those whom the gods will destroy, they first make mad'.

thanks

toyin


On 17 January 2018 at 13:08, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Consider: In Benue alone Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows


It is now obvious that  law enforcement is powerless, that unfortunate events are now in control and forcing us to be witnessing the politicization of the cattle industry in Nigeria. Not the politicization of the distribution or the final cost of the finished product that turns up in your pepper soup and no questions about where the cow was born and its/ his/ her long journey to your dinner table. No Sir, the stomachs of Southern Nigeria's beef-eating carnivorous men don't complain or even care to know that blood was shed or how the beef turned up in their stomachs.


I agree with the direction in which you sometimes point with your whole hand, Chidi.


As Bob Marley asked,


"Why can't we roam (oh-oh-oh-oh) this open country? (open country)

Oh, why can't we be what we want to be? (oh-oh-oh-oh-oh)

We want to be free (want to be free)"


Just as in that Woody Guthrie song "this land is your land" - so too  - as a nationality

Fulani Cattle of whatever breed should be able to roam the open country, on their four legs, ambulating, undulating from state to state, as a right given by man to animal; should be able to graze wherever they want in Nigeria agreed, but not on other people's private property !


Nor should they chew other people's crops with impunity as they are now doing without the express authority of  Human Citizen X, the farm owner's permission.


Graceland




On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 22:25:34 UTC+1, Chidi Anthony Opara wrote:
By Chidi Anthony Opara

The herdsmen 
Head to the hinterland
On grazeland grab,
Helped by henchmen
Of the helmsman.

The cows must graze
On the grasslands
Of the hinterlands,
The land owners
Must be helped to their graves.

The colour
Of the Benue river changed,
Its colour now crimson.

(Poem presented as social service, all rights reserved)


--

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Grazeland Grab (Poem)

$
0
0
Cornelius,

So, were you in Taraba yourself ascertaining the facts of the case? Are you not in Europe?

What makes you think Sanusi's story is credible? It is not, for the reasons I have given.

The account by the Taraba state govt and CAN Taraba, describing a clash between Fulani and Mambila ethnicities in which, regrettably, eight Fulani lives were lost, is more credible than Sanusi's unrealistic tale, particularly since the Taraba state govt described the specific steps taken by them to address the issue while Sanusi wants us to believe that he responded to a tragedy of the magnitude he claims by reporting his findings to the fed govt and thence keeping quiet in the face of the infamy Fulani herdsmen, militia and supporting Fulani politicians are steadily amassing in Nigeria.

How did I slander Sanusi? Did I state anything about his history that is not factual?

Sanusi is a man in search of an identity. If he is to have a significant place in history, he needs to reconcile his paradoxes. It is self contradictory to aspire to reform Northern Nigerian medievalisms and yet marry a nineteen year old girl, in addition to your other wives,  in your 50s as he did. It is self defeating to claim to be a financial reformer as Nigeria's chief central banker and yet give out huge sums of Nigeria's money to constituencies chosen, most likely, by you alone, constituencies largely represented by your own ethno/religious enclave, the largest of these beneficiaries  eventually awarding you a controversial emirship. It is self contradictory to claim to be an arbiter for justice as in his essay lamenting how Igbos have been systematically punished through structural exclusions for their role in the civil war and yet use yourself in legitimizing Fulani terrorism, basing your intervention on a ridiculously obviously lie.

The man has great potential but he suffers from self disruption.

thanks

toyin







On 17 January 2018 at 23:17, Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:

Almost like putting a questionable  value  lives of the Fulani herdsmen killed, in response to the report of Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows, such a horrendous national tragedy, sitting there in luxury and comfort in Lagos, far from the scene of the crime,  in the name of all the dead and injured, you honestly  want us to  believe - to  take your word as true that, "The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie." ? Could you care to give us an accurate body count?


Secondly, your  talk of  "Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria" Do you feel that  this is the public place for you to wilfully slander and vilify the Venerable Emir of Kano because you regard him as a non-political figure? He certainly has a large following.


As to appetite for beef. Maybe something for you to agree with: Cemeteries.  From the  GBS Vg point of view : Graveyards


Adios amigo...



On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 22:23:32 UTC+1, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie.

This strategy of lying is standard when the Fulani terrorists  want to justify their massacres of innocent populations in the face of national outcries over such barbarism.

This particular lie has been mutating since it was introduced by Sanusi lamido Sanusi to justify/ excuse the recent massacre in Benue by Fulani terrosts

Identifying himself as a patron of the Miyetti Allah/MACBAN,, the Fulani cattle herder's  association at the heart of this crisis, he claimed 800  Fulani were killed in Taraba and that he furnished the govt with the information, but the govt did nothing.

The Taraba state govt and  CAN Taraba promptly called him out on his lie.

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria, the man who, immediately he became  CBN governor enacted controversial sweeping changes that destroyed some banks and led executives like Cecilia Ibru to forfeit huge assets including their banks, the same man who practically ran a parallel govt as CBN governor, making regular public pronouncements as to how the country is or should be run in terms of structural changes to the system, so much so he was being touted as Presidential material, the man who fought then President GEJ to a standstill , the man who told the President publicly that the President could not remove him when the President asked him to resign over allegations of conniving with the political opposition, the person, who, for the first time perhaps in the CBN's history, dished out huge sums of money, largely to Northern Muslim states, and particularly Kano, defending that as corporate social responsibility when he was challenged,   the same person whom GEJ could remove only by suspending him when he was out of the country, the President claiming he was being investigated for his management of bank finances,  the same man who survived that political defeat by being made made Emir of the same Kano to which he had donated such huge sums, his coronation possibly upstaging an anticipated heir, the son of the immediate past Emir,  the same Sanusi, who, as Emir, rocked the Northern Muslim establishment by repeatedly, loudly  and radically advocating drastic reforms in the  Northern Muslim social system  which he described as backwardly medieval, only to be silenced through concerted blackmail in which he was reminded of the dethronement of his father as emir even as a probe into his use of the Emirates finances was announced as about to be instituted,  an initiative that was dropped after it was clear Sanusi had got the message, following which he was cured of his  reformist aspirations,  the same corporately suave, internationally visible central bank governor and outspoken royal leader Sanusi  could not call even a press conference with the Nigerian media talk less adding the international media to report to the world and demand justice for a grievous act of such massive proportions as the massacre of 800 of his people in the face of the rising profile of Fulani as greedily bloodthirsty people and desperately cunning  land grabbers following  Fulani generated massacres leading almost a year ago to  Ekiti state anti-open grazing law and a recently instituted similar law in Benue but emerges with this story after the outburst of national horror following the savagery of what is being described as the latest round of Fulani generated ethnic cleansing in Benue even as the Fulani President of Nigeria looks on in tacit support that includes never apprehending, talk less prosecuting his kinsmen as they publicly call press conferences to justify their actions after each new massacre?

Haba!

Impunity can be taken only so far.

After some time, it becomes madness.

The same goes for this kangaroo revision of the Sanusi introduced strategy narrative by Benue MACBAN.

These are people whom the entire country has steadily become restive about on account of the escalation of their terrorist activity after their kinsman, Muhammadu Buhari, became President, ceding the leadership of all the nation's security services to his kinsmen, services that arrest only people who try to protect themselves from the nation wide scourge of the Fulani militia's successive massacres, from the Middle Belt to the South East.

Ekiti state governor Ayodele Fayose boldly instituted an anti-open grazing law and created an armed policing unit to enforce it, open grazing being a primary vehicle for individual and group terrorism by either violent herdsmen or the sophisticatedly  armed militia associated with them, their military wing who carry out massacres across the nation.  The terrorists have since left Ekiti state alone bcs Fayose is a very dangerous foe and the SW is increasingly mobilising agst the APC coalition that brought Buhari to power, it now being clear that they have been betrayed by Buhari's faction in the APC, the recent inauguration of Gani Adams with his militant credentials as Are Ona Kakanfo, war leader of Yorubaland, sending a strong signal about the orientation of Yorubaland in the current stormy times.

Facing the recurrent massacres by Fulani militia in Benue, after an extensive consultation process with various stakeholders   lasting weeks if not months, the Benue state government banned  open grazing. MACBAN kicked agst he law, vowing to continue business as usual and publicly summoned Fulani to converge in Benue, following which they massacred large numbers, men, women and children in Benue, in the most gruesome manner, later openly justifying the murders, vowing to resist all anti-open grazing laws.

As outrage rises, they manufacture new stories of justification.

In the midst of this hell of state sponsored terrorism, the aggressors are claiming that they lost 1,000 persons and 2 millions cows to Benue militia before the recent massacre by their own Fulani militia, and they kept quiet, raised no alarm, called no press conference to demonstrate how they were being massacred  even though people have been describing them as bloodthirsty landgrabbing aggressors, but are now calling one to make this allegation?

Haba!

The Greeks state 'those whom the gods will destroy, they first make mad'.

thanks

toyin


On 17 January 2018 at 13:08, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Consider: In Benue alone Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows


It is now obvious that  law enforcement is powerless, that unfortunate events are now in control and forcing us to be witnessing the politicization of the cattle industry in Nigeria. Not the politicization of the distribution or the final cost of the finished product that turns up in your pepper soup and no questions about where the cow was born and its/ his/ her long journey to your dinner table. No Sir, the stomachs of Southern Nigeria's beef-eating carnivorous men don't complain or even care to know that blood was shed or how the beef turned up in their stomachs.


I agree with the direction in which you sometimes point with your whole hand, Chidi.


As Bob Marley asked,


"Why can't we roam (oh-oh-oh-oh) this open country? (open country)

Oh, why can't we be what we want to be? (oh-oh-oh-oh-oh)

We want to be free (want to be free)"


Just as in that Woody Guthrie song "this land is your land" - so too  - as a nationality

Fulani Cattle of whatever breed should be able to roam the open country, on their four legs, ambulating, undulating from state to state, as a right given by man to animal; should be able to graze wherever they want in Nigeria agreed, but not on other people's private property !


Nor should they chew other people's crops with impunity as they are now doing without the express authority of  Human Citizen X, the farm owner's permission.


Graceland




On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 22:25:34 UTC+1, Chidi Anthony Opara wrote:
By Chidi Anthony Opara

The herdsmen 
Head to the hinterland
On grazeland grab,
Helped by henchmen
Of the helmsman.

The cows must graze
On the grasslands
Of the hinterlands,
The land owners
Must be helped to their graves.

The colour
Of the Benue river changed,
Its colour now crimson.

(Poem presented as social service, all rights reserved)


--

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Article: Lessons From Yoruba Cultural Strategy

$
0
0
The expression referred to in the essay may be better understood as metaphorical than literal.

Abiola's being cheated is often cited as the reason why OBJ was chosen by the PDP in order to placate the Yoruba, Abiola's ethnicity, even though the Yoruba people might not have identified with that decision by the political elite.

toyin

On 17 January 2018 at 17:53, Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi.opara@gmail.com> wrote:
Lawyer IBK,
You mean that if Professor Nwala's article, sent to and published by a blog I edit and publish, had contained portions considered seditious or libellous or both, that I would not have been held responsible in some ways?

You are always friendly to me in private, but would not miss any opportunity to put me down publicly.

Well, continue, it does not bother me. It is your problem not mine. Only you can help yourself.

I have at least given you the attention you have been dying for. Good day.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

SV: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: REVISITING PROFESSOR CHRIS IMAFIDON'S CLAIM TO OXFORD PROFESSORSHIP

$
0
0
Mr. Kadiri,
I have chosen to engage in this give and take because of my genuine belief that you, like myself are truly concerned about the sorry state of many of the institutions, particularly the technological sector, in our country, and that we want to find ways for improvement. We may arrive at different conclusions as to why things are the way they are, but our love of country is not in doubt.
I also always like to take any opportunity I have to share my own life experiences with the hope that someone may see some sense in it and probably put it to use. And this experience covers those that I gained in the industrial sector, both at home and in the USA; and in the academic sector, both in Nigeria and overseas.
I choose to revisit some of the points I raised in my previous two articles with the hope that I can make myself more understandable.
I have said that the Europeans and by logical extension, America have been building economies based on technology for more than two millenia. By this, I mean that Europeans, with individual and disparate skills and expertise in myriads of fields, have learnt to come together, to build structures and infrastructure for which we come to admire them. Thus, when we look at an A-380 airplane, or an I-Phone, we marvel at the engineering skills that brought these into existence. These are marvelous inventions indeed! However, we forget to take into account the tens of thousands – yes, tens of thousands - of diverse skills that brought these into exisence. These skills range from the expertise of the janitorial crew to the highest level of management. If these other skills had not been available, the engineers would not have had the opportunty to put their knowledge to use.
Now, I talked about the project owner. This is the one that is responsible for the planning, financing, executing, and completing a project in order to achieve the desired objective. This person, group or institution is also directly responsible for pulling these disparate skills together and making them achieve the goal he set. This person, group or institution is definitely more important that an engineer, technologist or scientist in the achievement of a goal, for without him, the engineer will be of no use.
In the ownership of a project, the level of commitment is definitely crucial. I have poined out that in most cases, the individual who is ready to commit his life and resources to a project is definitely able to achieve more than an institution or goverment.
Management of people is a lesson that the productive European countries and America learned many centuries ago and that has made them highly successful. Pulling experts together to achieve a set goal is itself a skill that must be learned by eperience. Asking our governments to do this subjects us to probable failure since the commitment will not be there even of the financial resources are available.
And definitely, asking our engineers and scientists to perform without this support system is setting them and us up for disappointment. An engineer or scientist is only as good as the institution in which he works. A fish is alive because it swims in water. If you put it on dry land, even though you stuff it with a lot of food, it soon becomes a dead fish.
In order for us, as Africans to gain these skills that only come with experience, each of us must commit to a goal we are interested in and become experts in that area. Within his area, we will be able to manage others, and set achievable goals, and generally become experts. Without these individual expertise, we will not be able to do many things.
I have chosen not to directly respond to some of the issues you raised in your article because I personally am not an expert in those areas. However, I laugh at your conclusion about Nigerians:
'Those that the gods will make slaves must first be disorganised. Nigerians are disorganised, they cannot organise even for a day, not to talk of future.' S. Kadiri
This to me, may constitute an individual challenge for you. No kidding. Set up a project whose ultimate objective is the organization of Nigerians and see if Nigerians will not respond.
FAKINLEDE

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Grazeland Grab (Poem)

$
0
0
Toyin,
"A nineteen-year-old girl" is an adult, so the marriage must have been consensual and valid.

"in addition to your other wives" is cultural.

Cultural reforms do not involve all aspects of culture. You reform the ones considered bad at the time of reformation, like if the man had married a minor, for example.

Polygamy is not yet considered bad in Sanusi's culture.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - STAR SPEECH: Senator Flake - Flake: "Reflexive “Fake News” Claims Not Good For Democracy"

$
0
0
wow

On 17 January 2018 at 20:16, Mobolaji Aluko <alukome@gmail.com> wrote:


A good speech from Senator Flake's mouth-hole.....no pun intended....





Flake: Reflexive "Fake News" Claims Not Good For Democracy

Warns against giving license to authoritarian leaders adopting the phrase to justify suppressing free speech abroad

WASHINGTON – U.S. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) today spoke on the Senate floor warning of the danger to democracy around the world posed by political leaders denying shared truths and reflexively dismissing facts as "fake news": 

"2017 was a year which saw the truth – objective, empirical, evidence-based truth – more battered and abused than any other in the history of our country, at the hands of the most powerful figure in our government. The impulses underlying the dissemination of such untruths are not benign. They have the effect of eroding trust in our vital institutions and conditioning the public to no longer trust them. The destructive effect of this kind of behavior on our democracy cannot be overstated.

"No politician will ever get to tell us what the truth is and is not. And anyone who presumes to try to attack or manipulate the truth to his own purposes should be made to realize the mistake and be held to account. That is our job here… Of course, a major difference between politicians and the free press is that the press usually corrects itself when it gets something wrong.

"No longer can we compound attacks on truth with our silent acquiescence. No longer can we turn a blind eye or a deaf ear to these assaults on our institutions. And Mr. President, an American president who cannot take criticism – who must constantly deflect and distort and distract – who must find someone else to blame -- is charting a very dangerous path…

"2018 must be the year in which the truth takes a stand against power that would weaken it. In this effort, the choice is quite simple. And in this effort, the truth needs as many allies as possible. Together, my colleagues, we are powerful. Together, we have it within us to turn back these attacks, right these wrongs, repair this damage, restore reverence for our institutions, and prevent further moral vandalism."

Video of Flake's remarks can be viewed here.

A complete transcript of Flake's prepared remarks can be viewed below.

***
Mr. President, near the beginning of the document that made us free, our Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote: "We hold these truths to be self-evident..." So, from our very beginnings, our freedom has been predicated on truth. The founders were visionary in this regard, understanding well that good faith and shared facts between the governed and the government would be the very basis of this ongoing idea of America.

As the distinguished former member of this body, Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York, famously said: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts." During the past year, I am alarmed to say that Senator Moynihan's proposition has likely been tested more severely than at any time in our history.

It is for that reason that I rise today, to talk about the truth, and its relationship to democracy. For without truth, and a principled fidelity to truth and to shared facts, Mr. President, our democracy will not last.

2017 was a year which saw the truth – objective, empirical, evidence-based truth -- more battered and abused than any other in the history of our country, at the hands of the most powerful figure in our government. It was a year which saw the White House enshrine "alternative facts" into the American lexicon, as justification for what used to be known simply as good old-fashioned falsehoods. It was the year in which an unrelenting daily assault on the constitutionally-protected free press was launched by that same White House, an assault that is as unprecedented as it is unwarranted. "The enemy of the people," was what the president of the United States called the free press in 2017.

Mr. President, it is a testament to the condition of our democracy that our own president uses words infamously spoken by Josef Stalin to describe his enemies. It bears noting that so fraught with malice was the phrase "enemy of the people," that even Nikita Khrushchev forbade its use, telling the Soviet Communist Party that the phrase had been introduced by Stalin for the purpose of "annihilating such individuals" who disagreed with the supreme leader.

This alone should be a source of great shame for us in this body, especially for those of us in the president's party. For they are shameful, repulsive statements. And, of course, the president has it precisely backward – despotism is the enemy of the people. The free press is the despot's enemy, which makes the free press the guardian of democracy. When a figure in power reflexively calls any press that doesn't suit him "fake news," it is that person who should be the figure of suspicion, not the press.

I dare say that anyone who has the privilege and awesome responsibility to serve in this chamber knows that these reflexive slurs of "fake news" are dubious, at best. Those of us who travel overseas, especially to war zones and other troubled areas around the globe, encounter members of U.S. based media who risk their lives, and sometimes lose their lives, reporting on the truth.  To dismiss their work as fake news is an affront to their commitment and their sacrifice.

According to the International Federation of Journalists, 80 journalists were killed in 2017, and a new report from the Committee to Protect Journalists documents that the number of journalists imprisoned around the world has reached 262, which is a new record. This total includes 21 reporters who are being held on "false news" charges.

Mr. President, so powerful is the presidency that the damage done by the sustained attack on the truth will not be confined to the president's time in office.  Here in America, we do not pay obeisance to the powerful – in fact, we question the powerful most ardently – to do so is our birthright and a requirement of our citizenship -- and so, we know well that no matter how powerful, no president will ever have dominion over objective reality.

No politician will ever get to tell us what the truth is and is not. And anyone who presumes to try to attack or manipulate the truth to his own purposes should be made to realize the mistake and be held to account. That is our job here. And that is just as Madison, Hamilton, and Jay would have it.

Of course, a major difference between politicians and the free press is that the press usually corrects itself when it gets something wrong. Politicians don't.

No longer can we compound attacks on truth with our silent acquiescence. No longer can we turn a blind eye or a deaf ear to these assaults on our institutions.  And Mr. President, an American president who cannot take criticism – who must constantly deflect and distort and distract – who must find someone else to blame -- is charting a very dangerous path. And a Congress that fails to act as a check on the president adds to the danger.

Now, we are told via twitter that today the president intends to announce his choice for the "most corrupt and dishonest" media awards. It beggars belief that an American president would engage in such a spectacle. But here we are.

And so, 2018 must be the year in which the truth takes a stand against power that would weaken it. In this effort, the choice is quite simple. And in this effort, the truth needs as many allies as possible. Together, my colleagues, we are powerful. Together, we have it within us to turn back these attacks, right these wrongs, repair this damage, restore reverence for our institutions, and prevent further moral vandalism.

Together, united in the purpose to do our jobs under the Constitution, without regard to party or party loyalty, let us resolve to be allies of the truth -- and not partners in its destruction.

It is not my purpose here to inventory all of the official untruths of the past year. But a brief survey is in order. Some untruths are trivial – such as the bizarre contention regarding the crowd size at last year's inaugural.

But many untruths are not at all trivial – such as the seminal untruth of the president's political career - the oft-repeated conspiracy about the birthplace of President Obama. Also not trivial are the equally pernicious fantasies about rigged elections and massive voter fraud, which are as destructive as they are inaccurate – to the effort to undermine confidence in the federal courts, federal law enforcement, the intelligence community and the free press, to perhaps the most vexing untruth of all – the supposed "hoax" at the heart of special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation.

To be very clear, to call the Russia matter a "hoax"– as the president has many times – is a falsehood. We know that the attacks orchestrated by the Russian government during the election were real and constitute a grave threat to both American sovereignty and to our national security.  It is in the interest of every American to get to the bottom of this matter, wherever the investigation leads.

Ignoring or denying the truth about hostile Russian intentions toward the United States leaves us vulnerable to further attacks. We are told by our intelligence agencies that those attacks are ongoing, yet it has recently been reported that there has not been a single cabinet-level meeting regarding Russian interference and how to defend America against these attacks. Not one. What might seem like a casual and routine untruth – so casual and routine that it has by now become the white noise of Washington - is in fact a serious lapse in the defense of our country.

Mr. President, let us be clear. The impulses underlying the dissemination of such untruths are not benign. They have the effect of eroding trust in our vital institutions and conditioning the public to no longer trust them. The destructive effect of this kind of behavior on our democracy cannot be overstated.

Mr. President, every word that a president utters projects American values around the world. The values of free expression and a reverence for the free press have been our global hallmark, for it is our ability to freely air the truth that keeps our government honest and keeps a people free. Between the mighty and the modest, truth is the great leveler. And so, respect for freedom of the press has always been one of our most important exports.

But a recent report published in our free press should raise an alarm. Reading from the story:

"In February…Syrian President Bashar Assad brushed off an Amnesty International report that some 13,000 people had been killed at one of his military prisons by saying, "You can forge anything these days, we are living in a fake news era."

In the Philippines, President Rodrigo Duterte has complained of being "demonized" by "fake news." Last month, the report continues, with our President, quote "laughing by his side" Duterte called reporters "spies."

In July, Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro complained to the Russian propaganda outlet, that the world media had "spread lots of false versions, lots of lies" about his country, adding, "This is what we call 'fake news' today, isn't it?"

There are more:

"A state official in Myanmar recently said, "There is no such thing as Rohingya. It is fake news," referring to the persecuted ethnic group.  

Leaders in Singapore, a country known for restricting free speech, have promised "fake news" legislation in the new year."

And on and on. This feedback loop is disgraceful, Mr. President. Not only has the past year seen an American president borrow despotic language to refer to the free press, but it seems he has in turn inspired dictators and authoritarians with his own language. This is reprehensible.

We are not in a "fake news" era, as Bashar Assad says. We are, rather, in an era in which the authoritarian impulse is reasserting itself, to challenge free people and free societies, everywhere.

In our own country, from the trivial to the truly dangerous, it is the range and regularity of the untruths we see that should be cause for profound alarm, and spur to action. Add to that the by-now predictable habit of calling true things false, and false things true, and we have a recipe for disaster.  As George Orwell warned, "The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it."

Any of us who have spent time in public life have endured news coverage we felt was jaded or unfair. But in our positions, to employ even idle threats to use laws or regulations to stifle criticism is corrosive to our democratic institutions. Simply put: it is the press's obligation to uncover the truth about power. It is the people's right to criticize their government. And it is our job to take it.

What is the goal of laying siege to the truth? President John F. Kennedy, in a stirring speech on the 20th anniversary of the Voice of America, was eloquent in answer to that question:

"We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people."

Mr. President, the question of why the truth is now under such assault may well be for historians to determine. But for those who cherish American constitutional democracy, what matters is the effect on America and her people and her standing in an increasingly unstable world -- made all the more unstable by these very fabrications. What matters is the daily disassembling of our democratic institutions.

 We are a mature democracy – it is well past time that we stop excusing or ignoring – or worse, endorsing -- these attacks on the truth. For if we compromise the truth for the sake of our politics, we are lost. 

 I sincerely thank my colleagues for their indulgence today. I will close by borrowing the words of an early adherent to my faith that I find has special resonance at this moment. His name was John Jacques, and as a young missionary in England he contemplated the question: "What is truth?" His search was expressed in poetry and ultimately in a hymn that I grew up with, titled "Oh Say, What is Truth." It ends as follows:

"Then say, what is truth? 'Tis the last and the first,

For the limits of time it steps o'er.

Tho the heavens depart and the earth's fountains burst.

Truth, the sum of existence, will weather the worst,

Eternal… unchanged… evermore."

Thank you, Mr. President. I yield the floor.

___________________________________________________________

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Grazeland Grab (Poem)

$
0
0

Toyin,


When you rake up a whole long paragraph of what from your point of view are his misdeeds,  you are guilty of slander whether your accusations are factual or not.


Just like Shakespeare's Prince Hal before being crowned Henry V, as a former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi may have  a chequered past but as a  religious leader in Nigeria the revered Emir of Kano Emir Muhammadu Sanusi is second in importance, only to the current  Sardauna of Sokoto, Sa'adu Abubakar . And now to add insult to injury  sitting on your armchair in Lagos you dare say  of the Emir of Kano , "Sanusi is a man in search of an identity."


I'm still learning about the matter : here is some food for thought : Mambila Genocide: Emir of Kano Didn't Lie, Mr. Governor




On Thursday, 18 January 2018 06:11:58 UTC+1, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
Cornelius,

So, were you in Taraba yourself ascertaining the facts of the case? Are you not in Europe?

What makes you think Sanusi's story is credible? It is not, for the reasons I have given.

The account by the Taraba state govt and CAN Taraba, describing a clash between Fulani and Mambila ethnicities in which, regrettably, eight Fulani lives were lost, is more credible than Sanusi's unrealistic tale, particularly since the Taraba state govt described the specific steps taken by them to address the issue while Sanusi wants us to believe that he responded to a tragedy of the magnitude he claims by reporting his findings to the fed govt and thence keeping quiet in the face of the infamy Fulani herdsmen, militia and supporting Fulani politicians are steadily amassing in Nigeria.

How did I slander Sanusi? Did I state anything about his history that is not factual?

Sanusi is a man in search of an identity. If he is to have a significant place in history, he needs to reconcile his paradoxes. It is self contradictory to aspire to reform Northern Nigerian medievalisms and yet marry a nineteen year old girl, in addition to your other wives,  in your 50s as he did. It is self defeating to claim to be a financial reformer as Nigeria's chief central banker and yet give out huge sums of Nigeria's money to constituencies chosen, most likely, by you alone, constituencies largely represented by your own ethno/religious enclave, the largest of these beneficiaries  eventually awarding you a controversial emirship. It is self contradictory to claim to be an arbiter for justice as in his essay lamenting how Igbos have been systematically punished through structural exclusions for their role in the civil war and yet use yourself in legitimizing Fulani terrorism, basing your intervention on a ridiculously obviously lie.

The man has great potential but he suffers from self disruption.

thanks

toyin







On 17 January 2018 at 23:17, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Almost like putting a questionable  value  lives of the Fulani herdsmen killed, in response to the report of Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows, such a horrendous national tragedy, sitting there in luxury and comfort in Lagos, far from the scene of the crime,  in the name of all the dead and injured, you honestly  want us to  believe - to  take your word as true that, "The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie." ? Could you care to give us an accurate body count?


Secondly, your  talk of  "Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria" Do you feel that  this is the public place for you to wilfully slander and vilify the Venerable Emir of Kano because you regard him as a non-political figure? He certainly has a large following.


As to appetite for beef. Maybe something for you to agree with: Cemeteries.  From the  GBS Vg point of view : Graveyards


Adios amigo...



On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 22:23:32 UTC+1, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie.

This strategy of lying is standard when the Fulani terrorists  want to justify their massacres of innocent populations in the face of national outcries over such barbarism.

This particular lie has been mutating since it was introduced by Sanusi lamido Sanusi to justify/ excuse the recent massacre in Benue by Fulani terrosts

Identifying himself as a patron of the Miyetti Allah/MACBAN,, the Fulani cattle herder's  association at the heart of this crisis, he claimed 800  Fulani were killed in Taraba and that he furnished the govt with the information, but the govt did nothing.

The Taraba state govt and  CAN Taraba promptly called him out on his lie.

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria, the man who, immediately he became  CBN governor enacted controversial sweeping changes that destroyed some banks and led executives like Cecilia Ibru to forfeit huge assets including their banks, the same man who practically ran a parallel govt as CBN governor, making regular public pronouncements as to how the country is or should be run in terms of structural changes to the system, so much so he was being touted as Presidential material, the man who fought then President GEJ to a standstill , the man who told the President publicly that the President could not remove him when the President asked him to resign over allegations of conniving with the political opposition, the person, who, for the first time perhaps in the CBN's history, dished out huge sums of money, largely to Northern Muslim states, and particularly Kano, defending that as corporate social responsibility when he was challenged,   the same person whom GEJ could remove only by suspending him when he was out of the country, the President claiming he was being investigated for his management of bank finances,  the same man who survived that political defeat by being made made Emir of the same Kano to which he had donated such huge sums, his coronation possibly upstaging an anticipated heir, the son of the immediate past Emir,  the same Sanusi, who, as Emir, rocked the Northern Muslim establishment by repeatedly, loudly  and radically advocating drastic reforms in the  Northern Muslim social system  which he described as backwardly medieval, only to be silenced through concerted blackmail in which he was reminded of the dethronement of his father as emir even as a probe into his use of the Emirates finances was announced as about to be instituted,  an initiative that was dropped after it was clear Sanusi had got the message, following which he was cured of his  reformist aspirations,  the same corporately suave, internationally visible central bank governor and outspoken royal leader Sanusi  could not call even a press conference with the Nigerian media talk less adding the international media to report to the world and demand justice for a grievous act of such massive proportions as the massacre of 800 of his people in the face of the rising profile of Fulani as greedily bloodthirsty people and desperately cunning  land grabbers following  Fulani generated massacres leading almost a year ago to  Ekiti state anti-open grazing law and a recently instituted similar law in Benue but emerges with this story after the outburst of national horror following the savagery of what is being described as the latest round of Fulani generated ethnic cleansing in Benue even as the Fulani President of Nigeria looks on in tacit support that includes never apprehending, talk less prosecuting his kinsmen as they publicly call press conferences to justify their actions after each new massacre?

Haba!

Impunity can be taken only so far.

After some time, it becomes madness.

The same goes for this kangaroo revision of the Sanusi introduced strategy narrative by Benue MACBAN.

These are people whom the entire country has steadily become restive about on account of the escalation of their terrorist activity after their kinsman, Muhammadu Buhari, became President, ceding the leadership of all the nation's security services to his kinsmen, services that arrest only people who try to protect themselves from the nation wide scourge of the Fulani militia's successive massacres, from the Middle Belt to the South East.

Ekiti state governor Ayodele Fayose boldly instituted an anti-open grazing law and created an armed policing unit to enforce it, open grazing being a primary vehicle for individual and group terrorism by either violent herdsmen or the sophisticatedly  armed militia associated with them, their military wing who carry out massacres across the nation.  The terrorists have since left Ekiti state alone bcs Fayose is a very dangerous foe and the SW is increasingly mobilising agst the APC coalition that brought Buhari to power, it now being clear that they have been betrayed by Buhari's faction in the APC, the recent inauguration of Gani Adams with his militant credentials as Are Ona Kakanfo, war leader of Yorubaland, sending a strong signal about the orientation of Yorubaland in the current stormy times.

Facing the recurrent massacres by Fulani militia in Benue, after an extensive consultation process with various stakeholders   lasting weeks if not months, the Benue state government banned  open grazing. MACBAN kicked agst he law, vowing to continue business as usual and publicly summoned Fulani to converge in Benue, following which they massacred large numbers, men, women and children in Benue, in the most gruesome manner, later openly justifying the murders, vowing to resist all anti-open grazing laws.

As outrage rises, they manufacture new stories of justification.

In the midst of this hell of state sponsored terrorism, the aggressors are claiming that they lost 1,000 persons and 2 millions cows to Benue militia before the recent massacre by their own Fulani militia, and they kept quiet, raised no alarm, called no press conference to demonstrate how they were being massacred  even though people have been describing them as bloodthirsty landgrabbing aggressors, but are now calling one to make this allegation?

Haba!

The Greeks state 'those whom the gods will destroy, they first make mad'.

thanks

toyin


On 17 January 2018 at 13:08, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Consider: In Benue alone Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows


It is now obvious that  law enforcement is powerless, that unfortunate events are now in control and forcing us to be witnessing the politicization of the cattle industry in Nigeria. Not the politicization of the distribution or the final cost of the finished product that turns up in your pepper soup and no questions about where the cow was born and its/ his/ her long journey to your dinner table. No Sir, the stomachs of Southern Nigeria's beef-eating carnivorous men don't complain or even care to know that blood was shed or how the beef turned up in their stomachs.


I agree with the direction in which you sometimes point with your whole hand, Chidi.


As Bob Marley asked,


"Why can't we roam (oh-oh-oh-oh) this open country? (open country)

Oh, why can't we be what we want to be? (oh-oh-oh-oh-oh)

We want to be free (want to be free)"


Just as in that Woody Guthrie song "this land is your land" - so too  - as a nationality

Fulani Cattle of whatever breed should be able to roam the open country, on their four legs, ambulating, undulating from state to state, as a right given by man to animal; should be able to graze wherever they want in Nigeria agreed, but not on other people's private property !


Nor should they chew other people's crops with impunity as they are now doing without the express authority of  Human Citizen X, the farm owner's permission.


Graceland




On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 22:25:34 UTC+1, Chidi Anthony Opara wrote:
By Chidi Anthony Opara

The herdsmen 
Head to the hinterland
On grazeland grab,
Helped by henchmen
Of the helmsman.

The cows must graze
On the grasslands
Of the hinterlands,
The land owners
Must be helped to their graves.

The colour
Of the Benue river changed,
Its colour now crimson.

(Poem presented as social service, all rights reserved)


--

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - SV: Buhari's son and Benue's sons

$
0
0
"The most tragic thing about the herdsmen in Nigeria is not just the killings in Benue but that there are academics who defend nomadic pastoralism as constitutionally guaranteed freedom of movement in the 21st century while they themselves will not accept freedom to live in mud houses with thatched roofs equipped with clay pots and jugs serving as water coolers and reservoirs."

Protecting the lives of all Nigerians is the responsibility of government. However, this anti intellectualism is sadning. Two unrelated issues have been mixed up.Denying others the right hold contrary view without aducing any reason is unacademic. There are concurrent killings in other parts of Nigeria where the Fulani are victims, and in greater numbers too. The Governor of Bebue claim they are herdsmen. The Inspector General of police that they are communal clashes. Is it too much to wait and unravel the truth?
Is nomadic pastoralism practised by the Fulani more primitive than nomadic agriculture practiced by the vast majority of the people of Benue and Nigeria? A national challenge cannot be solved in the way and manner of the Benue approach. It just spews  more problems. May be we need to listen to the Governor of Plateau state and other stake holders.
 


On Monday, January 15, 2018, 10:16:35 PM GMT+1, Salimonu Kadiri <ogunlakaiye@hotmail.com> wrote:


Under President Goodluck Jonathan, Nigeria was a Banana Republic where simians held the courts. Under President Muhammadu Buhari, Nigeria is fast degenerating into a Latrine Republic (apology to Trump's shit hole) where maggots rule. President Buhari's visit to Benue would have been a symbolic gesture without any positive effect on the victims and their relatives. Buhari has surrounded himself with callous people. Show me your friend and I will tell you the type of person you are.


In October 2016, the wife of President Buhari, Aisha Buhari alerted the nation about the hijack of her husband's government in a BBC Hausa language broadcast but none of us listened to her. Here follows excerpts from the BBC interview with Mrs. Aisha Buhari.

BBC - Almost two years after President Muhammadu Buhari was elected into this government, it appears as if things are not going on well, the people are complaining: where do you think the problem is?  

Aisha Buhari - .... I think so far so good. The only thing that almost everybody is not happy with, including myself, is on those that really suffered for this journey and now people who do not even have registration cards, are guiding us, which is so unfair and unfortunate for the journey that we started for more than thirteen years ago. People who never knew about APC manifesto, what APC campaigned for and promised the people are in the government. People were just sitting down in their houses, folding their arms only for them to be called to come and head an agency or a ministerial position. They don't have a mission or vision of our APC, you understand what I mean? 


BBC - Whose falt is this?


Aisha Buhari - It's the fault of 15.429 million people because they are the one that brought in the government. It's their fault. They should protest, the 15.429 million that voted for Buhari and APC. 


BBC - As his wife, what will be your advice to him going forward?


Aisha Buhari - My advice is to the whole people that voted for him. They should strengthen the party and who ever is not part of the party should not have control over fifteen point something million people. We are in a democracy, not military era, so we have to play it well and leave a legacy.

Aisha also declared in the interview that if things did not change she would not go out to campaign for her husband in 2019 as she did in 2015. 

When this interview was relayed on BBC, Buhari was on a State visit to Germany where he was confronted to react. In the presence of Chancellor Angela Merkel and her Defence Minister, Ursula Gertrud von der Leyen, both of them women, Buhari drew the locker room joke, my wife belongs to the kitchen, living room and the other room. It was a perfect distraction from the issue of non-elected people that are ruling Nigeria in the name of Buhari. Instead of trouping out in protest to reclaim their mandates for change, Nigerians, especially the intellectuals kept quiet and allowed the old and the new PDP to seize control of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary in Nigeria.


Some have accused Buhari of being too provincial and nepotic in his appointments to strategic positions, especially, in the presidency, but that should not have mattered if his appointees are competent and nationally orientated in their services to all Nigerians. Judging by certain events that have occurred in Buhari's presidency, there is reason to doubt his mental ability to rule Nigeria. To begin with, President Mohammadu Buhari forwarded the name of Ibrahim Magu to the Senate for confirmation as the substantive Chairman of the EFCC. The DSS, whose Director General is an appointee of the President, and which is an agency under the President sent a letter to the Senate opposing the confirmation of Ibrahim Magu, as a substantive Chairman, on the ground of lacking integrity. The senate, accordingly, refused to confirm the appointment of Magu. President Buhari reacted by asking his Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, to investigate the DSS allegations against Ibrahim Magu. Since the President re-submitted the name of Ibrahim Magu to the Senate, it must be assumed that Malami's report exonerated Magu of the allegations levelled against him by the DSS. Once again, the DSS wrote another report to the Senate to negate President Buhari's recommendation on Magu to the Senate. By standard practice, nominees of the president get security clearance before their names are sent to the National Assembly for confirmation and where the President decides to act against the recommendation of the DSS under him, the latter cannot challenge the President by openly opposing his choice at the National Assembly. When Buhari was on medical vacation, the Acting President, Yemi Osinbajo, said that as long as Buhari is the President and he is vice President, Ibrahim Magu will remain the Head of EFCC. On Magu, the Minister of Justice countered the Acting President, saying Osinbajo is on his own. https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/235975-magu-osinbajo-is-on-his-own-attorney-general-malami-says.html. As of date, Magu is still acting Chairman of the EFCC and his traducers, the DSS headed by Lawal Musa Daura and Attorney General Malami are still holding their positions under Buhari. There had been reports where the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, had used the constitutional power confer on him to arbitrarily withdraw cases of corruption being prosecuted in courts by the EFCC. 


In Lagos, at Osborne Towers Ikoyi, the EFCC on 12 April 2017 found the sum of $43.4 million, £27,000, and N23.2 million cash in a four-bedroom apartment located at 16 Osborne Road. It was alleged that the apartment belong to the National Security Adviser to President Buhari, Babagana Monguno. However, the Director General of the National Intelligence Agency, Ayo Oke, claimed that the money belonged to his agency for an undisclosed operation. After a report of an enquiry set up by President Buhari, he suspended Ayo Oke as DG of NIA. Similarly, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir Lawal was alleged to have awarded his private company a contract to cut grass around internally displaced persons (IDP) camps in Borno for N270 million. Subsequent enquiry proved the allegation right and Babachir Lawal was suspended from office. Both Lawal and Oke were dismissed from office and replaced on the same day.  However, on 21 November 2017, EFCC officials armed with both search and arrest warrants were prevented from arresting former DG of  DSS under Jonathan and DG of NIA, Ayodele Oke, on account of the over $43 million found in a private apartment in Lagos. The President has shown no public interest in the case. 


On 30 August 2017, the Minister of State in the Oil Ministry, Dr. Ibe Kachikwu wrote a secret memo to President Muhammadu Buhari, alleging that the Group Managing Director of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Dr. Maikanti Baru, was involved in illegal practices and insubordination. The letter which was leaked to the online media on October 3, 2017, revealed that Dr. Ibe Kachichwu decided to write the memo to the President after all efforts by him to talk to the President face to face were blocked. Until, on and after, 3 October 2017, there was no reaction to Dr. Ibe Kachikwu's memo to the President on how the engine or heart of the Nigerian economy, oil, was being mismanaged. Did the President, who is also the substantive Oil Minister, receive the memo or not? If yes, why did the President keep silent over it? If no, who received the memo in the Presidency and kept it from the sight of the President? Despite the media noise for some days, Buhari did not make any public statement on the memo of his subordinate in the Oil Ministry till date.


Abdul-Rasheed Maina was former Chairman of the Presidential Task Force on Pension Reforms, under President Goodluck Jonathan. He was found culpable with others to have looted the pension fond of billions of dollars during the era of the much regarded docile President Jonathan in 2013. Maina fled the country and Jonathan dismissed him from the service for absent without leave. Suddenly, Abdul-Rasheed Maina was recalled and reinstated into the civil service and posted to the Ministry of Interior as Assistant Director from 28 September 2017. When the Premium Times in Nigeria blew out this news, it was discovered that the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami; Minister of Interior, Abdul-Rahman Dambazu; Chief of Staff to the President, Abba Kyari; and Director General of DSS, Lawal Musa Daura masterminded not only Maina's recall and reinstatement into the service but also offered him SSS-police protection. Buhari ordered immediate dismissal of Maina who disappeared from the country under the purview of the DSS despite the fact that the EFCC had declared him wanted for billion dollars fraud from the pension funds. The facilitators of Maina's escape are still in office around Buhari who came to power under the promise of change and fighting corruption.


In a resent interview in Sahara Reporters, a 92-year-old, Alhaji Tanko Yakasai said among other things, "I believe there are five important ingredients necessary for successful political leadership, and these include capacity, competence, vision, planning and integrity. In my opinion, our present national leadership is totally lacking those ingredients. All of them are inherent, they cannot be bought or borrowed...." Tanko Yakasai observation about Buhari, if true, may be a consolation for those of us who are disappointed about the outcome of his regime so far. The most tragic thing about the herdsmen in Nigeria is not just the killings in Benue but that there are academics who defend nomadic pastoralism as constitutionally guaranteed freedom of movement in the 21st century while they themselves will not accept freedom to live in mud houses with thatched roofs equipped with clay pots and jugs serving as water coolers and reservoirs. In his book titled : The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, published in 1922, the first Governor General of British Colonised Nigeria, Frederick John Dealtry Lugard wrote, "He (the African Negro) lacks power of organisation and is conspicuously deficient in the management and control alike of men or of business. He loves the display of power, but fails to realise its responsibility. ....//... He has the courage of the fighting animal - an instinct rather than a moral virtue (p. 69-70)." Looking at Nigeria's leaders today we must regret that his recorded observations on the qualities of Black Africans are correct. 

S. Kadiri



 




Från: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> för Toyin Falola <toyinfalola@austin.utexas.edu>
Skickat: den 12 januari 2018 20:07
Till: dialogue
Ämne: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Buhari's son and Benue's sons
 

If President Buhari can take his son to Germany for health treatment (no one's son should die, before anyone misinterprets me), I need to be educated why President Buhari cannot visit Benue State to empathize (lower than sympathize) with those who have lost their own sons and daughters.

Am I naïve?

Is governance not about caring for the collective people of a nation?

Moderator

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: REVISITING PROFESSOR CHRIS IMAFIDON'S CLAIM TO OXFORD PROFESSORSHIP

$
0
0
Can there be a meeting point between these two perspectives?:

​'​
The purpose of giving Western Education to us, therefore, is to colonise us economically and mentally. In practice Western education converts us to trained dogs that always swerve tail in readiness to obey any command from our Western World masters no matter how dangerous the command is to our wellbeing..
​'

Kadiri


​' Europeans, with individual and disparate skills and expertise in myriads of fields, have learnt to come together, to build structures and infrastructure for which we come to admire them. Thus, when we look at an A-380 airplane, or an I-Phone, we marvel at the engineering skills that brought these into existence. These are marvelous inventions indeed!'

Kayode


The technology enthusiast, Kayode, is arguing that-


'I could imagine a Nigerian graduate from a Nigerian university being asked to go run a petroleum company or even manufacture a car. He does not have the qualification AND he does not exist within an economic system that would make gaining the experience possible. There is simply no technologically constructed economic system yet.


Now, Is that the reason why he cannot manufacture even a pin? Sadly, that is the reason. The technology involved in manufacturing a pin is not much far removed from that involved in manufacturing a large airliner.'


Kayode makes this moving point-


​'​
The process in achieving a technologically oriented economy lies not in castigating our graduates. While teaching in a Nigerian technological university, I was able to empathize with many of our students and their lecturers. While these people do not lack in intelligence, they are definitely not equipped to become masters of industry. I also know that this is not just a case of importing the most modern equipment to teach the students. The simple fact is that there is no support system to make things happen yet.
​'


Kayode, demonstrating a technocratic mentality, has presented an opinion as to why a person educated in the Nigerian system is not likely to grasp the principles of running modern technological systems, particularly in engineering.


Kadiri , on the other hand,   focuses is on dismissing Western education in Nigeria bcs Nigerians have proven unable to develop adequately its possibilities so as to provide basic amenities, depicting this education as structurally impaired, designed to make the Nigerian a slave of the creators of that educational system.


Can this be true? Is Western education in Nigeria a structurally incapacitating system, different in a fundamental way from the experience of the same system in the West?


Can this be true in the arts, where Nigerians educated and working in Nigeria have been able to build a global influence?


Is such achievement often an expression of a degree of education as an academic migrant in the West, experiencing that system in its undiluted, unsabotaged form?


How relevant are these qs for the sciences?


Is the challenge faced inherent in the character of Western education in Nigeria, the context in which it is conducted or both?


toyin






On 18 January 2018 at 06:29, Kayode J. Fakinlede <jfakinlede@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Kadiri,
I have chosen to engage in this give and take because of my genuine belief that you, like myself are truly concerned about the sorry state of many of the institutions, particularly the technological sector, in our country, and that we want to find ways for improvement. We may arrive at different conclusions as to why things are the way they are, but our love of country is not in doubt.
I also always like to take any opportunity I have to share my own life experiences with the hope that someone may see some sense in it and probably put it to use. And this experience covers those that I gained in the industrial sector, both at home and in the USA; and in the academic sector, both in Nigeria and overseas.
I choose to revisit some of the points I raised in my previous two articles with the hope that I can make myself more understandable.
I have said that the Europeans and by logical extension, America have been building economies based on technology for more than two millenia. By this, I mean that Europeans, with individual and disparate skills and expertise in myriads of fields, have learnt to come together, to build structures and infrastructure for which we come to admire them. Thus, when we look at an A-380 airplane, or an I-Phone, we marvel at the engineering skills that brought these into existence. These are marvelous inventions indeed! However, we forget to take into account the tens of thousands – yes, tens of thousands - of diverse skills that brought these into exisence. These skills range from the expertise of the janitorial crew to the highest level of management. If these other skills had not been available, the engineers would not have had the opportunty to put their knowledge to use.
Now, I talked about the project owner. This is the one that is responsible for the planning, financing, executing, and completing a project in order to achieve the desired objective. This person, group or institution is also directly responsible for pulling these disparate skills together and making them achieve the goal he set. This person, group or institution is definitely more important that an engineer, technologist or scientist in the achievement of a goal, for without him, the engineer will be of no use.
In the ownership of a project, the level of commitment is definitely crucial. I have poined out that in most cases, the individual who is ready to commit his life and resources to a project is definitely able to achieve more than an institution or goverment.
Management of people is a lesson that the productive European countries and America learned many centuries ago and that has made them highly successful. Pulling experts together to achieve a set goal is itself a skill that must be learned by eperience. Asking our governments to do this subjects us to probable failure since the commitment will not be there even of the financial resources are available.
And definitely, asking our engineers and scientists to perform without this support system is setting them and us up for disappointment. An engineer or scientist is only as good as the institution in which he works. A fish is alive because it swims in water. If you put it on dry land, even though you stuff it with a lot of food, it soon becomes a dead fish.
In order for us, as Africans to gain these skills that only come with experience, each of  us must commit to a goal we are interested in and become experts in that area. Within his area, we will be able to manage others, and set achievable goals, and generally become experts. Without these individual expertise, we will not be able to do many things.
I have chosen not to directly respond to some of the issues you raised in your article because  I personally am not an expert in those areas. However, I laugh at your conclusion about Nigerians:
'Those that the gods will make slaves must first be disorganised. Nigerians are disorganised, they cannot organise even for a day, not to talk of future.' S. Kadiri
This to me, may constitute an individual challenge for you. No kidding. Set up a project whose ultimate objective is the organization of Nigerians and see if Nigerians will not respond.
FAKINLEDE

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

USA Africa Dialogue Series - Arewa Youth Consultative Forum VP Insists President Must Declare Fulani Herdsmen a Terrorist Organization : A Pleasantly Shocking Deviation from the Norm in the Muslim North

$
0
0
Shocking news.

I am rendered speechless.

Video:


Verbal reports



I hope the desperately dogmatic  ones amogst this man's ethno/religious compatriots dont kill him.

toyin

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

USA Africa Dialogue Series - Fw: Stanfeld's op ed response to Trump's racist diatribe regarding African nations

$
0
0
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Stanfeld's op ed response to Trump's racist diatribe
regarding African nations
Date: 2018/01/17 10:32
From: John Stanfield <faithandjusticeinc@gmail.com>
To: John Stanfield <faithandjusticeinc@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JOHN STANFIELD <JStanfield@hsrc.ac.za>
Date: Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 3:32 PM
Subject: Stanfeld's op ed response to Trump's racist diatribe regarding
African nations
To: John Stanfield <JStanfield@hsrc.ac.za>

Please see attached op ed essay published in _The Star, _a major South
African newspaper_ _ today. Kind Regards, John

PROFESSOR JOHN H. STANFIELD,II

Distinguished Research Fellow at Research Director Rank Research Council


Research Programme on Democracy, Governance, and Service Delivery (DGSD)


Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC)

Merchant House 2nd Floor Rm.205

116-118 Buitengracht Street

Cape Town

8000

Email: jstanfield@hsrc.ac.za

Mobile: +27-64-735-9228 [1]

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail or any
document.
_This email and its contents are subject to the HSRC's e-mail legal
notice which can be viewed at: http://www.hsrc.ac.za/en/disclaimer [2]._



Links:
------
[1] tel:+27%2064%20735%209228
[2] http://www.hsrc.ac.za/en/disclaimer

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Grazeland Grab (Poem)

$
0
0
"Sanusi Lamido Sanusi may have a chequered past but as a religious leader in Nigeria the revered Emir of Kano Emir Muhammadu Sanusi is second in importance, only to the current Sardauna of Sokoto, Sa'adu Abubakar" (Cornelius Hamelberg).

Nigeria is supposedly, a secular state, so, their Islamic levels of importance should have nothing to with a non Moslem citizen.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Grazeland Grab (Poem)

$
0
0
Thanks, Cornelius and Chidi.

I thought slander involved presenting false information. Did I provide any false information on Sanusi? In presenting my case, was I unjust to him, imputing values not related to his history?

What has my Lagos armchair got to with my assessment of Sanusi, in today's information age? From what I have written its clear I am informed abut his multiple roles, as public commentator to activist to CBN governor to Emir. The only one I did not mention is his prominence as an Islamic scholar.

Sanusi's complexity is what makes him Sanusi. That complexity is a demonstration of serious agency grounded in a strong self definition as Fulani within Nigeria's ethno/religious complexity. The problem, might be, like people like such other other Northern Muslim and perhaps Fulani intellectuals like Adamu Adamu and Aliyu Tilde,  their understanding of what it means to be Fulani or Northern Muslim is not deep enough to mobilise their creative powers maximally, a factional narrowness leading a bright mind like Adamu Adamu unable to rise beyond serving narrow ethnic interests, hobbling these figures  at a time when the region needs direction to enter modernity even more than the South.

Sanusi would have earned an eternal place in history if he stuck through the storm thrown at him in attack of his reformist aspirations of Northern Muslim social organization as Emir of Kano, in which such an inane thing as his internet bill was being invoked in relation to a man with the potential to operate as a global executive and a scholar at the intersection of Islamic thought and the contemporary world at a time when such competence is in dire need. I wonder if he could have used his eloquence to defeat those arrayed agst him in a struggle in which he called out a Northern governor for superstitiously describing a disease outbreak in his state  as due to moral laxity when in fact adequate medical processes were not applied to the situation.

Nimi Wariboko makes the following point in his The Principles of Excellence, although I'm not sure if I have coupled together his lines from different parts of the text to give a succinct  idea of a concept it took a number of paragraphs  to elaborate:

                                        The Kalabari will say "tombo tombo so", "let a person become a person", when a person
                                                 is called to rise up to an event, to be faithful to  its expected and unexpected demands, the
                                                demands of  a moment in which a person decides his or her identity,  the crucible of the
                                                extraordinary in which true maleness or femaleness emerges.


in which 'so' is the Kalabari conception of the realized potential of the individual, those aspects of their possibilities they have been able to bring into existence, while 'So' is the divine plenitude representing further possibilities available for actualization. 

Sanusi is clearly a man who is able to sense his potential but might not how how best to realise it, a  caged tiger, like the tiger of Borges " Inferno, 1,32" who resented his prison cage, yearning blindly for the glorious freedom of a powerful beast in its wild habitat but not knowing what exactly he wanted bcs he had never lived such a life, having been brought up in captivity, until God revealed to him in a dream the purpose of life and its role in the scheme of the universe, a revelation he identified with in the dream but which he forgot on waking,  the knowledge revealed being beyond the capacity of his mind to retain, leaving him with a vague restlessness, "a powerful ignorance".

On becoming CBN governor, Sanusi rode high on the spectacular bank reforms he initiated and from that platform, he spoke out recurrently and loudly on sweeping policy issues of the nation as a whole, an approach some described as valuable for a man in private life or even in politics but not for a central bank governor, though he was saying things Nigerians wanted and needed to hear.

Should he have resigned to make those pronouncements? Should he have operated as an activist  after his tenure had expired, using the prominence he gained from that position to magnify the reach of his voice?

Did he need to stay on in that job after being asked to resign by GEJ, entering into a public contest of will with the President or resigned and dramatized his resignation as a response to overbearing executive intimidation and overreach, using that martyr status as  a platform to jump start an activist career even as he escalated his international prominence as a reformist central bank governor in a corrupt environment, particularly since the tipping point in his conflict with GEJ came about from Sanusi's allegations suggesting massive fraud in NNPC, a person who would always be in demand as a global financial consultant, having won an award from outside Nigeria as central bank governor of the year, if I  recall correctly, a voice in the development of alternatives to capitalism as represented by his championing of Islamic banking in an era in which the Islamic contribution to world civilization is under attack by Islamic terrorists and anti-Islam scepticism?

He stayed on and GEJ outmaneuvered him, suspending him from work in order to investigate claims of financial impropriety GEJ claimed,  a move that might have been possible bcs the governors might have seen him as a threat to their own ambitions, being people without the national platform he was using with such visibility.

He then got the job as Emir of Kano, using that again to pursue a reformist agenda desperately needed  by the Muslim North, but not before perpetuating the tradition of marrying young girls  which contributes significantly to poverty and social disruption in the region through non-education of girls and breakdown of their reproductive organs due to strain from the strength of their bodies not being fully formed before being exposed to vigorous sexual and reproductive demands, problems which his 19 year old bride is not likely to suffer from on account of his wealth and exposure  but an act which represents  a negative example to the people he eventually preached to.

We now have this story of his being the lightning rod for Miyetti Allah apex leadership that never speaks in spite of the massacres carried out by its members, leaving that to lower level leadership, until this latest climatic pint in their murder campaign.

While Shehu Sani,  Kaduna state senator, has been known to  at least convene a meeting with his fellow Fulani to discuss with them the allegations agst them and their own grievances, while Comrade Mohammed Kudu Abubakar, Deputy National President of Arewa Youth Consultative Forum, insists the herdsmen must respect the laws of their  hosting states and should be declared terrorists for their recurrent massacres, Sanusi is silent and inactive until he becomes the Miyetti Allah mouthpiece justifying massacre in Benue by pointing to a preposterous  claim of another massacre in Taraba.

This latest development is  pathetic. The man is fragmented and his environment is not helping  him achieve integration. He might be able to achieve that integration only through rebellion agst the negativities of that environment but he does not seem ready yet to pay the price, nor does he seem to have worked out how to proceed diplomatically on the reformist mission while not seeming to publicly break ranks with the representatives of the system he wants to reform,  having yearned for the emirship for most of the life according to one view.

toyin













On 18 January 2018 at 11:13, Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:

Toyin,


When you rake up a whole long paragraph of what from your point of view are his misdeeds,  you are guilty of slander whether your accusations are factual or not.


Just like Shakespeare's Prince Hal before being crowned Henry V, as a former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi may have  a chequered past but as a  religious leader in Nigeria the revered Emir of Kano Emir Muhammadu Sanusi is second in importance, only to the current  Sardauna of Sokoto, Sa'adu Abubakar . And now to add insult to injury  sitting on your armchair in Lagos you dare say  of the Emir of Kano , "Sanusi is a man in search of an identity."


I'm still learning about the matter : here is some food for thought : Mambila Genocide: Emir of Kano Didn't Lie, Mr. Governor




On Thursday, 18 January 2018 06:11:58 UTC+1, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
Cornelius,

So, were you in Taraba yourself ascertaining the facts of the case? Are you not in Europe?

What makes you think Sanusi's story is credible? It is not, for the reasons I have given.

The account by the Taraba state govt and CAN Taraba, describing a clash between Fulani and Mambila ethnicities in which, regrettably, eight Fulani lives were lost, is more credible than Sanusi's unrealistic tale, particularly since the Taraba state govt described the specific steps taken by them to address the issue while Sanusi wants us to believe that he responded to a tragedy of the magnitude he claims by reporting his findings to the fed govt and thence keeping quiet in the face of the infamy Fulani herdsmen, militia and supporting Fulani politicians are steadily amassing in Nigeria.

How did I slander Sanusi? Did I state anything about his history that is not factual?

Sanusi is a man in search of an identity. If he is to have a significant place in history, he needs to reconcile his paradoxes. It is self contradictory to aspire to reform Northern Nigerian medievalisms and yet marry a nineteen year old girl, in addition to your other wives,  in your 50s as he did. It is self defeating to claim to be a financial reformer as Nigeria's chief central banker and yet give out huge sums of Nigeria's money to constituencies chosen, most likely, by you alone, constituencies largely represented by your own ethno/religious enclave, the largest of these beneficiaries  eventually awarding you a controversial emirship. It is self contradictory to claim to be an arbiter for justice as in his essay lamenting how Igbos have been systematically punished through structural exclusions for their role in the civil war and yet use yourself in legitimizing Fulani terrorism, basing your intervention on a ridiculously obviously lie.

The man has great potential but he suffers from self disruption.

thanks

toyin







On 17 January 2018 at 23:17, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Almost like putting a questionable  value  lives of the Fulani herdsmen killed, in response to the report of Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows, such a horrendous national tragedy, sitting there in luxury and comfort in Lagos, far from the scene of the crime,  in the name of all the dead and injured, you honestly  want us to  believe - to  take your word as true that, "The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie." ? Could you care to give us an accurate body count?


Secondly, your  talk of  "Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria" Do you feel that  this is the public place for you to wilfully slander and vilify the Venerable Emir of Kano because you regard him as a non-political figure? He certainly has a large following.


As to appetite for beef. Maybe something for you to agree with: Cemeteries.  From the  GBS Vg point of view : Graveyards


Adios amigo...



On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 22:23:32 UTC+1, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie.

This strategy of lying is standard when the Fulani terrorists  want to justify their massacres of innocent populations in the face of national outcries over such barbarism.

This particular lie has been mutating since it was introduced by Sanusi lamido Sanusi to justify/ excuse the recent massacre in Benue by Fulani terrosts

Identifying himself as a patron of the Miyetti Allah/MACBAN,, the Fulani cattle herder's  association at the heart of this crisis, he claimed 800  Fulani were killed in Taraba and that he furnished the govt with the information, but the govt did nothing.

The Taraba state govt and  CAN Taraba promptly called him out on his lie.

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria, the man who, immediately he became  CBN governor enacted controversial sweeping changes that destroyed some banks and led executives like Cecilia Ibru to forfeit huge assets including their banks, the same man who practically ran a parallel govt as CBN governor, making regular public pronouncements as to how the country is or should be run in terms of structural changes to the system, so much so he was being touted as Presidential material, the man who fought then President GEJ to a standstill , the man who told the President publicly that the President could not remove him when the President asked him to resign over allegations of conniving with the political opposition, the person, who, for the first time perhaps in the CBN's history, dished out huge sums of money, largely to Northern Muslim states, and particularly Kano, defending that as corporate social responsibility when he was challenged,   the same person whom GEJ could remove only by suspending him when he was out of the country, the President claiming he was being investigated for his management of bank finances,  the same man who survived that political defeat by being made made Emir of the same Kano to which he had donated such huge sums, his coronation possibly upstaging an anticipated heir, the son of the immediate past Emir,  the same Sanusi, who, as Emir, rocked the Northern Muslim establishment by repeatedly, loudly  and radically advocating drastic reforms in the  Northern Muslim social system  which he described as backwardly medieval, only to be silenced through concerted blackmail in which he was reminded of the dethronement of his father as emir even as a probe into his use of the Emirates finances was announced as about to be instituted,  an initiative that was dropped after it was clear Sanusi had got the message, following which he was cured of his  reformist aspirations,  the same corporately suave, internationally visible central bank governor and outspoken royal leader Sanusi  could not call even a press conference with the Nigerian media talk less adding the international media to report to the world and demand justice for a grievous act of such massive proportions as the massacre of 800 of his people in the face of the rising profile of Fulani as greedily bloodthirsty people and desperately cunning  land grabbers following  Fulani generated massacres leading almost a year ago to  Ekiti state anti-open grazing law and a recently instituted similar law in Benue but emerges with this story after the outburst of national horror following the savagery of what is being described as the latest round of Fulani generated ethnic cleansing in Benue even as the Fulani President of Nigeria looks on in tacit support that includes never apprehending, talk less prosecuting his kinsmen as they publicly call press conferences to justify their actions after each new massacre?

Haba!

Impunity can be taken only so far.

After some time, it becomes madness.

The same goes for this kangaroo revision of the Sanusi introduced strategy narrative by Benue MACBAN.

These are people whom the entire country has steadily become restive about on account of the escalation of their terrorist activity after their kinsman, Muhammadu Buhari, became President, ceding the leadership of all the nation's security services to his kinsmen, services that arrest only people who try to protect themselves from the nation wide scourge of the Fulani militia's successive massacres, from the Middle Belt to the South East.

Ekiti state governor Ayodele Fayose boldly instituted an anti-open grazing law and created an armed policing unit to enforce it, open grazing being a primary vehicle for individual and group terrorism by either violent herdsmen or the sophisticatedly  armed militia associated with them, their military wing who carry out massacres across the nation.  The terrorists have since left Ekiti state alone bcs Fayose is a very dangerous foe and the SW is increasingly mobilising agst the APC coalition that brought Buhari to power, it now being clear that they have been betrayed by Buhari's faction in the APC, the recent inauguration of Gani Adams with his militant credentials as Are Ona Kakanfo, war leader of Yorubaland, sending a strong signal about the orientation of Yorubaland in the current stormy times.

Facing the recurrent massacres by Fulani militia in Benue, after an extensive consultation process with various stakeholders   lasting weeks if not months, the Benue state government banned  open grazing. MACBAN kicked agst he law, vowing to continue business as usual and publicly summoned Fulani to converge in Benue, following which they massacred large numbers, men, women and children in Benue, in the most gruesome manner, later openly justifying the murders, vowing to resist all anti-open grazing laws.

As outrage rises, they manufacture new stories of justification.

In the midst of this hell of state sponsored terrorism, the aggressors are claiming that they lost 1,000 persons and 2 millions cows to Benue militia before the recent massacre by their own Fulani militia, and they kept quiet, raised no alarm, called no press conference to demonstrate how they were being massacred  even though people have been describing them as bloodthirsty landgrabbing aggressors, but are now calling one to make this allegation?

Haba!

The Greeks state 'those whom the gods will destroy, they first make mad'.

thanks

toyin


On 17 January 2018 at 13:08, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Consider: In Benue alone Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows


It is now obvious that  law enforcement is powerless, that unfortunate events are now in control and forcing us to be witnessing the politicization of the cattle industry in Nigeria. Not the politicization of the distribution or the final cost of the finished product that turns up in your pepper soup and no questions about where the cow was born and its/ his/ her long journey to your dinner table. No Sir, the stomachs of Southern Nigeria's beef-eating carnivorous men don't complain or even care to know that blood was shed or how the beef turned up in their stomachs.


I agree with the direction in which you sometimes point with your whole hand, Chidi.


As Bob Marley asked,


"Why can't we roam (oh-oh-oh-oh) this open country? (open country)

Oh, why can't we be what we want to be? (oh-oh-oh-oh-oh)

We want to be free (want to be free)"


Just as in that Woody Guthrie song "this land is your land" - so too  - as a nationality

Fulani Cattle of whatever breed should be able to roam the open country, on their four legs, ambulating, undulating from state to state, as a right given by man to animal; should be able to graze wherever they want in Nigeria agreed, but not on other people's private property !


Nor should they chew other people's crops with impunity as they are now doing without the express authority of  Human Citizen X, the farm owner's permission.


Graceland




On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 22:25:34 UTC+1, Chidi Anthony Opara wrote:
By Chidi Anthony Opara

The herdsmen 
Head to the hinterland
On grazeland grab,
Helped by henchmen
Of the helmsman.

The cows must graze
On the grasslands
Of the hinterlands,
The land owners
Must be helped to their graves.

The colour
Of the Benue river changed,
Its colour now crimson.

(Poem presented as social service, all rights reserved)


--

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Re: Grazeland Grab (Poem)

$
0
0
Edited


Thanks, Cornelius and Chidi.

I thought slander involved presenting false information. Did I provide any false information on Sanusi? In presenting my case, was I unjust to him, imputing values not related to his history?

What has my Lagos armchair got to with my assessment of Sanusi, in today's information age? From what I have written its clear I am informed abut his multiple roles, as public commentator to activist to CBN governor to Emir. The only one I did not mention is his prominence as an Islamic scholar.

Sanusi's complexity is what makes him Sanusi. That complexity is a demonstration of serious agency grounded in a strong self definition as Fulani within Nigeria's ethno/religious complexity. The problem, might be, like  such other other Northern Muslim and perhaps Fulani intellectuals like Adamu Adamu and Aliyu Tilde,  their understanding of what it means to be Fulani or Northern Muslim is not deep enough to mobilise their creative powers maximally, a factional narrowness leading a bright mind like Adamu Adamu unable to rise beyond serving narrow ethnic interests, hobbling these figures  at a time when the region needs direction to enter modernity even more than the South.

Sanusi would have earned an eternal place in history if he stuck through the storm thrown at him in attack of his reformist aspirations of Northern Muslim social organization as Emir of Kano, in which such an inane thing as his internet bill was being invoked agst him in relation to a man with the potential to operate as a global executive and a scholar at the intersection of Islamic thought and the contemporary world at a time when such competence is in dire need. I wonder if he could not have used his eloquence to defeat those arrayed agst him in a struggle in which he called out a Northern governor for superstitiously describing a disease outbreak in his state  as due to moral laxity when in fact adequate medical processes were not applied to the situation.

Nimi Wariboko makes the following point in his The Principles of Excellence, although I'm not sure if I have coupled together his lines from different parts of the text to give a succinct  idea of a concept it took a number of paragraphs  to elaborate:

                                        The Kalabari will say "tombo tombo so", "let a person become a person", when a person
                                                 is called to rise up to an event, to be faithful to  its expected and unexpected demands, the
                                                demands of  a moment in which a person decides his or her identity,  the crucible of the
                                                extraordinary in which true maleness or femaleness emerges.


in which 'so' is the Kalabari conception of the realized potential of the individual, those aspects of their possibilities they have been able to bring into existence, while 'So' is the divine plenitude representing further possibilities available for actualization. 

Sanusi is clearly a man who is able to sense his potential but might not how how best to realise it, a  caged tiger, like the tiger of Borges' " Inferno, 1,32" who resented his prison cage, yearning blindly for the glorious freedom of a powerful beast in its wild habitat but not knowing what exactly he wanted bcs he had never lived such a life, having been brought up in captivity, until God revealed to him in a dream the purpose of his life and its role in the scheme of the universe, a revelation he identified with in the dream but which he forgot on waking,  the knowledge revealed being beyond the capacity of his mind to retain, leaving him with a vague restlessness, "a powerful ignorance".

On becoming CBN governor, Sanusi rode high on the spectacular bank reforms he initiated, and from that platform, he spoke out recurrently and loudly on sweeping policy issues of the nation as a whole, an approach some described as valuable for a man in private life or even in politics but not for a central bank governor, though he was saying things Nigerians wanted and needed to hear.

Should he have resigned to make those pronouncements? Should he have operated as an activist  after his tenure had expired, using the prominence he gained from that position to magnify the reach of his voice?

Did he need to stay on in that job after being asked to resign by GEJ, entering into a public contest of will with the President or resigned and dramatized his resignation as a response to overbearing executive intimidation and overreach, using that martyr status as  a platform to jumpstart an activist career even as he escalated his international prominence as a reformist central bank governor in a corrupt environment, particularly since the tipping point in his conflict with GEJ came about from Sanusi's allegations suggesting massive fraud in NNPC, a person who would always be in demand as a global financial consultant, having won an award from outside Nigeria as central bank governor of the year, if I  recall correctly, a voice in the development of alternatives to capitalism as represented by his championing of Islamic banking in an era in which the Islamic contribution to world civilization is under attack by Islamic terrorists and anti-Islam scepticism?

He stayed on and GEJ outmaneuvered him, suspending him from work in order to investigate claims of financial impropriety as GEJ claimed,  a move that might have been possible bcs the governors might have seen Sanusi as a threat to their own ambitions, being people without the national platform he was using with such visibility.

He then got the job as Emir of Kano, using that again to pursue a reformist agenda desperately needed  by the Muslim North, but not before perpetuating the tradition of marrying young girls  which contributes significantly to poverty and social disruption in the region through non-education of girls and breakdown of their reproductive organs due to strain from the strength of their bodies not being fully formed before being exposed to vigorous sexual and reproductive demands, problems which his 19 year old bride is not likely to suffer from on account of his wealth and exposure  but an act which represents  a negative example to the people he eventually preached to.

We now have this story of his being the lightning rod for Miyetti Allah apex leadership that never speaks in spite of the massacres carried out by its members, leaving that to lower level leadership, until this latest climatic pint in their murder campaign.

While Shehu Sani,  Kaduna state senator, has been known to  at least convene a meeting with his fellow Fulani to discuss with them the allegations agst them and their own grievances, while Comrade Mohammed Kudu Abubakar, Deputy National President of Arewa Youth Consultative Forum, insists the herdsmen must respect the laws of their  hosting states and should be declared terrorists for their recurrent massacres, Sanusi is silent and inactive until he becomes the Miyetti Allah mouthpiece justifying massacre in Benue by pointing to a preposterous  claim of another massacre in Taraba.

This latest development is  pathetic. The man is fragmented and his environment is not helping  him achieve integration. He might be able to achieve that integration only through rebellion agst the negativities of that environment but he does not seem ready yet to pay the price, nor does he seem to have worked out how to proceed diplomatically on the reformist mission while not seeming to publicly break ranks with the representatives of the system he wants to reform,  having yearned for the emirship for most of his life, according to one view.

toyin

On 18 January 2018 at 13:49, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin.adepoju@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, Cornelius and Chidi.

I thought slander involved presenting false information. Did I provide any false information on Sanusi? In presenting my case, was I unjust to him, imputing values not related to his history?

What has my Lagos armchair got to with my assessment of Sanusi, in today's information age? From what I have written its clear I am informed abut his multiple roles, as public commentator to activist to CBN governor to Emir. The only one I did not mention is his prominence as an Islamic scholar.

Sanusi's complexity is what makes him Sanusi. That complexity is a demonstration of serious agency grounded in a strong self definition as Fulani within Nigeria's ethno/religious complexity. The problem, might be, like people like such other other Northern Muslim and perhaps Fulani intellectuals like Adamu Adamu and Aliyu Tilde,  their understanding of what it means to be Fulani or Northern Muslim is not deep enough to mobilise their creative powers maximally, a factional narrowness leading a bright mind like Adamu Adamu unable to rise beyond serving narrow ethnic interests, hobbling these figures  at a time when the region needs direction to enter modernity even more than the South.

Sanusi would have earned an eternal place in history if he stuck through the storm thrown at him in attack of his reformist aspirations of Northern Muslim social organization as Emir of Kano, in which such an inane thing as his internet bill was being invoked in relation to a man with the potential to operate as a global executive and a scholar at the intersection of Islamic thought and the contemporary world at a time when such competence is in dire need. I wonder if he could have used his eloquence to defeat those arrayed agst him in a struggle in which he called out a Northern governor for superstitiously describing a disease outbreak in his state  as due to moral laxity when in fact adequate medical processes were not applied to the situation.

Nimi Wariboko makes the following point in his The Principles of Excellence, although I'm not sure if I have coupled together his lines from different parts of the text to give a succinct  idea of a concept it took a number of paragraphs  to elaborate:

                                        The Kalabari will say "tombo tombo so", "let a person become a person", when a person
                                                 is called to rise up to an event, to be faithful to  its expected and unexpected demands, the
                                                demands of  a moment in which a person decides his or her identity,  the crucible of the
                                                extraordinary in which true maleness or femaleness emerges.


in which 'so' is the Kalabari conception of the realized potential of the individual, those aspects of their possibilities they have been able to bring into existence, while 'So' is the divine plenitude representing further possibilities available for actualization. 

Sanusi is clearly a man who is able to sense his potential but might not how how best to realise it, a  caged tiger, like the tiger of Borges " Inferno, 1,32" who resented his prison cage, yearning blindly for the glorious freedom of a powerful beast in its wild habitat but not knowing what exactly he wanted bcs he had never lived such a life, having been brought up in captivity, until God revealed to him in a dream the purpose of life and its role in the scheme of the universe, a revelation he identified with in the dream but which he forgot on waking,  the knowledge revealed being beyond the capacity of his mind to retain, leaving him with a vague restlessness, "a powerful ignorance".

On becoming CBN governor, Sanusi rode high on the spectacular bank reforms he initiated and from that platform, he spoke out recurrently and loudly on sweeping policy issues of the nation as a whole, an approach some described as valuable for a man in private life or even in politics but not for a central bank governor, though he was saying things Nigerians wanted and needed to hear.

Should he have resigned to make those pronouncements? Should he have operated as an activist  after his tenure had expired, using the prominence he gained from that position to magnify the reach of his voice?

Did he need to stay on in that job after being asked to resign by GEJ, entering into a public contest of will with the President or resigned and dramatized his resignation as a response to overbearing executive intimidation and overreach, using that martyr status as  a platform to jump start an activist career even as he escalated his international prominence as a reformist central bank governor in a corrupt environment, particularly since the tipping point in his conflict with GEJ came about from Sanusi's allegations suggesting massive fraud in NNPC, a person who would always be in demand as a global financial consultant, having won an award from outside Nigeria as central bank governor of the year, if I  recall correctly, a voice in the development of alternatives to capitalism as represented by his championing of Islamic banking in an era in which the Islamic contribution to world civilization is under attack by Islamic terrorists and anti-Islam scepticism?

He stayed on and GEJ outmaneuvered him, suspending him from work in order to investigate claims of financial impropriety GEJ claimed,  a move that might have been possible bcs the governors might have seen him as a threat to their own ambitions, being people without the national platform he was using with such visibility.

He then got the job as Emir of Kano, using that again to pursue a reformist agenda desperately needed  by the Muslim North, but not before perpetuating the tradition of marrying young girls  which contributes significantly to poverty and social disruption in the region through non-education of girls and breakdown of their reproductive organs due to strain from the strength of their bodies not being fully formed before being exposed to vigorous sexual and reproductive demands, problems which his 19 year old bride is not likely to suffer from on account of his wealth and exposure  but an act which represents  a negative example to the people he eventually preached to.

We now have this story of his being the lightning rod for Miyetti Allah apex leadership that never speaks in spite of the massacres carried out by its members, leaving that to lower level leadership, until this latest climatic pint in their murder campaign.

While Shehu Sani,  Kaduna state senator, has been known to  at least convene a meeting with his fellow Fulani to discuss with them the allegations agst them and their own grievances, while Comrade Mohammed Kudu Abubakar, Deputy National President of Arewa Youth Consultative Forum, insists the herdsmen must respect the laws of their  hosting states and should be declared terrorists for their recurrent massacres, Sanusi is silent and inactive until he becomes the Miyetti Allah mouthpiece justifying massacre in Benue by pointing to a preposterous  claim of another massacre in Taraba.

This latest development is  pathetic. The man is fragmented and his environment is not helping  him achieve integration. He might be able to achieve that integration only through rebellion agst the negativities of that environment but he does not seem ready yet to pay the price, nor does he seem to have worked out how to proceed diplomatically on the reformist mission while not seeming to publicly break ranks with the representatives of the system he wants to reform,  having yearned for the emirship for most of the life according to one view.

toyin













On 18 January 2018 at 11:13, Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com> wrote:

Toyin,


When you rake up a whole long paragraph of what from your point of view are his misdeeds,  you are guilty of slander whether your accusations are factual or not.


Just like Shakespeare's Prince Hal before being crowned Henry V, as a former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Sanusi Lamido Sanusi may have  a chequered past but as a  religious leader in Nigeria the revered Emir of Kano Emir Muhammadu Sanusi is second in importance, only to the current  Sardauna of Sokoto, Sa'adu Abubakar . And now to add insult to injury  sitting on your armchair in Lagos you dare say  of the Emir of Kano , "Sanusi is a man in search of an identity."


I'm still learning about the matter : here is some food for thought : Mambila Genocide: Emir of Kano Didn't Lie, Mr. Governor




On Thursday, 18 January 2018 06:11:58 UTC+1, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
Cornelius,

So, were you in Taraba yourself ascertaining the facts of the case? Are you not in Europe?

What makes you think Sanusi's story is credible? It is not, for the reasons I have given.

The account by the Taraba state govt and CAN Taraba, describing a clash between Fulani and Mambila ethnicities in which, regrettably, eight Fulani lives were lost, is more credible than Sanusi's unrealistic tale, particularly since the Taraba state govt described the specific steps taken by them to address the issue while Sanusi wants us to believe that he responded to a tragedy of the magnitude he claims by reporting his findings to the fed govt and thence keeping quiet in the face of the infamy Fulani herdsmen, militia and supporting Fulani politicians are steadily amassing in Nigeria.

How did I slander Sanusi? Did I state anything about his history that is not factual?

Sanusi is a man in search of an identity. If he is to have a significant place in history, he needs to reconcile his paradoxes. It is self contradictory to aspire to reform Northern Nigerian medievalisms and yet marry a nineteen year old girl, in addition to your other wives,  in your 50s as he did. It is self defeating to claim to be a financial reformer as Nigeria's chief central banker and yet give out huge sums of Nigeria's money to constituencies chosen, most likely, by you alone, constituencies largely represented by your own ethno/religious enclave, the largest of these beneficiaries  eventually awarding you a controversial emirship. It is self contradictory to claim to be an arbiter for justice as in his essay lamenting how Igbos have been systematically punished through structural exclusions for their role in the civil war and yet use yourself in legitimizing Fulani terrorism, basing your intervention on a ridiculously obviously lie.

The man has great potential but he suffers from self disruption.

thanks

toyin







On 17 January 2018 at 23:17, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Almost like putting a questionable  value  lives of the Fulani herdsmen killed, in response to the report of Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows, such a horrendous national tragedy, sitting there in luxury and comfort in Lagos, far from the scene of the crime,  in the name of all the dead and injured, you honestly  want us to  believe - to  take your word as true that, "The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie." ? Could you care to give us an accurate body count?


Secondly, your  talk of  "Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria" Do you feel that  this is the public place for you to wilfully slander and vilify the Venerable Emir of Kano because you regard him as a non-political figure? He certainly has a large following.


As to appetite for beef. Maybe something for you to agree with: Cemeteries.  From the  GBS Vg point of view : Graveyards


Adios amigo...



On Wednesday, 17 January 2018 22:23:32 UTC+1, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju wrote:
The story of loss of lives, and of that magnitude, by Fulani herdsmen, is a lie.

This strategy of lying is standard when the Fulani terrorists  want to justify their massacres of innocent populations in the face of national outcries over such barbarism.

This particular lie has been mutating since it was introduced by Sanusi lamido Sanusi to justify/ excuse the recent massacre in Benue by Fulani terrosts

Identifying himself as a patron of the Miyetti Allah/MACBAN,, the Fulani cattle herder's  association at the heart of this crisis, he claimed 800  Fulani were killed in Taraba and that he furnished the govt with the information, but the govt did nothing.

The Taraba state govt and  CAN Taraba promptly called him out on his lie.

Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the most consistently vocal non-politician Fulani in Nigeria, the man who, immediately he became  CBN governor enacted controversial sweeping changes that destroyed some banks and led executives like Cecilia Ibru to forfeit huge assets including their banks, the same man who practically ran a parallel govt as CBN governor, making regular public pronouncements as to how the country is or should be run in terms of structural changes to the system, so much so he was being touted as Presidential material, the man who fought then President GEJ to a standstill , the man who told the President publicly that the President could not remove him when the President asked him to resign over allegations of conniving with the political opposition, the person, who, for the first time perhaps in the CBN's history, dished out huge sums of money, largely to Northern Muslim states, and particularly Kano, defending that as corporate social responsibility when he was challenged,   the same person whom GEJ could remove only by suspending him when he was out of the country, the President claiming he was being investigated for his management of bank finances,  the same man who survived that political defeat by being made made Emir of the same Kano to which he had donated such huge sums, his coronation possibly upstaging an anticipated heir, the son of the immediate past Emir,  the same Sanusi, who, as Emir, rocked the Northern Muslim establishment by repeatedly, loudly  and radically advocating drastic reforms in the  Northern Muslim social system  which he described as backwardly medieval, only to be silenced through concerted blackmail in which he was reminded of the dethronement of his father as emir even as a probe into his use of the Emirates finances was announced as about to be instituted,  an initiative that was dropped after it was clear Sanusi had got the message, following which he was cured of his  reformist aspirations,  the same corporately suave, internationally visible central bank governor and outspoken royal leader Sanusi  could not call even a press conference with the Nigerian media talk less adding the international media to report to the world and demand justice for a grievous act of such massive proportions as the massacre of 800 of his people in the face of the rising profile of Fulani as greedily bloodthirsty people and desperately cunning  land grabbers following  Fulani generated massacres leading almost a year ago to  Ekiti state anti-open grazing law and a recently instituted similar law in Benue but emerges with this story after the outburst of national horror following the savagery of what is being described as the latest round of Fulani generated ethnic cleansing in Benue even as the Fulani President of Nigeria looks on in tacit support that includes never apprehending, talk less prosecuting his kinsmen as they publicly call press conferences to justify their actions after each new massacre?

Haba!

Impunity can be taken only so far.

After some time, it becomes madness.

The same goes for this kangaroo revision of the Sanusi introduced strategy narrative by Benue MACBAN.

These are people whom the entire country has steadily become restive about on account of the escalation of their terrorist activity after their kinsman, Muhammadu Buhari, became President, ceding the leadership of all the nation's security services to his kinsmen, services that arrest only people who try to protect themselves from the nation wide scourge of the Fulani militia's successive massacres, from the Middle Belt to the South East.

Ekiti state governor Ayodele Fayose boldly instituted an anti-open grazing law and created an armed policing unit to enforce it, open grazing being a primary vehicle for individual and group terrorism by either violent herdsmen or the sophisticatedly  armed militia associated with them, their military wing who carry out massacres across the nation.  The terrorists have since left Ekiti state alone bcs Fayose is a very dangerous foe and the SW is increasingly mobilising agst the APC coalition that brought Buhari to power, it now being clear that they have been betrayed by Buhari's faction in the APC, the recent inauguration of Gani Adams with his militant credentials as Are Ona Kakanfo, war leader of Yorubaland, sending a strong signal about the orientation of Yorubaland in the current stormy times.

Facing the recurrent massacres by Fulani militia in Benue, after an extensive consultation process with various stakeholders   lasting weeks if not months, the Benue state government banned  open grazing. MACBAN kicked agst he law, vowing to continue business as usual and publicly summoned Fulani to converge in Benue, following which they massacred large numbers, men, women and children in Benue, in the most gruesome manner, later openly justifying the murders, vowing to resist all anti-open grazing laws.

As outrage rises, they manufacture new stories of justification.

In the midst of this hell of state sponsored terrorism, the aggressors are claiming that they lost 1,000 persons and 2 millions cows to Benue militia before the recent massacre by their own Fulani militia, and they kept quiet, raised no alarm, called no press conference to demonstrate how they were being massacred  even though people have been describing them as bloodthirsty landgrabbing aggressors, but are now calling one to make this allegation?

Haba!

The Greeks state 'those whom the gods will destroy, they first make mad'.

thanks

toyin


On 17 January 2018 at 13:08, Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com> wrote:

Consider: In Benue alone Fulani herdsmen  lost 1,000 Persons, 2 million Cows


It is now obvious that  law enforcement is powerless, that unfortunate events are now in control and forcing us to be witnessing the politicization of the cattle industry in Nigeria. Not the politicization of the distribution or the final cost of the finished product that turns up in your pepper soup and no questions about where the cow was born and its/ his/ her long journey to your dinner table. No Sir, the stomachs of Southern Nigeria's beef-eating carnivorous men don't complain or even care to know that blood was shed or how the beef turned up in their stomachs.


I agree with the direction in which you sometimes point with your whole hand, Chidi.


As Bob Marley asked,


"Why can't we roam (oh-oh-oh-oh) this open country? (open country)

Oh, why can't we be what we want to be? (oh-oh-oh-oh-oh)

We want to be free (want to be free)"


Just as in that Woody Guthrie song "this land is your land" - so too  - as a nationality

Fulani Cattle of whatever breed should be able to roam the open country, on their four legs, ambulating, undulating from state to state, as a right given by man to animal; should be able to graze wherever they want in Nigeria agreed, but not on other people's private property !


Nor should they chew other people's crops with impunity as they are now doing without the express authority of  Human Citizen X, the farm owner's permission.


Graceland




On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 22:25:34 UTC+1, Chidi Anthony Opara wrote:
By Chidi Anthony Opara

The herdsmen 
Head to the hinterland
On grazeland grab,
Helped by henchmen
Of the helmsman.

The cows must graze
On the grasslands
Of the hinterlands,
The land owners
Must be helped to their graves.

The colour
Of the Benue river changed,
Its colour now crimson.

(Poem presented as social service, all rights reserved)


--

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - SV: Buhari's son and Benue's sons

$
0
0
Nurudeen, 

You're guilty of the age-old sin of selective perception. The "communal clash" comment of the IGP was appropriately met with outrage and derision and he apologized to the Benue people during the town hall in Makurdi and said his statement had been misquoted. And of course, you conveniently left out the fact that Miyetti Allah publicly and repeatedly claimed responsibility for the mass murders, saying it was revenge for the theft of 1000 herdsmen cattle when the herdsmen were allegedly migrating through Benue communities to Nasarawa. The same way they arrogantly claimed responsibility for the Agatu massacre of over 500 people and also claimed that it was payback for cattle theft and for the killing of one of their kinsmen. 

A group of people have confessed to a genocidal crime but you are here duplicitously and mischievously saying we should wait to unravel it before we ask for justice and deterrence. How about asking the law enforcement agencies to arrest the Miyetti Allah officials that have been making the TV and media arounds and organizing press conferences to boast about the killings? How about asking the president to set up a military task force or declare a military operation to deal with this menace of armed herdsmen killings--similar to what he did in the south with a much lesser security threat? Where is your humanity? 

And who are you to tell the Benue people how to solve a problem that has taken and continues to take the lives of their people? Only yesterday, the armed herdsmen militia killed an additional 8 people in three local governments of the state. And you say a state facing genocide in the hands of an armed, murderous herdsmen militia, whom the government would not disarm or excoriate or arrest, has no right to ban the activity (open grazing) that is the cause of these mass killings? You're are talking like Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, the terrorist group which threatened Benue state with punitive actions for passing the anti-open grazing law and proceeded to carry out the threat by unleashing its genocidal militia on the state. You should know better than to repeat and reinforce the violent, arrogant, threatening rhetoric of that terrorist organization, which is constantly telling Benue and other states to either drop anti-open grazing laws or face an escalation in the crisis--a direct threat of violence that people like you would rather lionize instead of condemn. Are you not by your claim that the anti-open grazing law in Benue will escalate the killings endorsing that odious, threatening, and violent rhetoric of impunity?

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 4:24 AM, 'Nuruddeen Abubakar' via USA Africa Dialogue Series <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> wrote:
"The most tragic thing about the herdsmen in Nigeria is not just the killings in Benue but that there are academics who defend nomadic pastoralism as constitutionally guaranteed freedom of movement in the 21st century while they themselves will not accept freedom to live in mud houses with thatched roofs equipped with clay pots and jugs serving as water coolers and reservoirs."

Protecting the lives of all Nigerians is the responsibility of government. However, this anti intellectualism is sadning. Two unrelated issues have been mixed up.Denying others the right hold contrary view without aducing any reason is unacademic. There are concurrent killings in other parts of Nigeria where the Fulani are victims, and in greater numbers too. The Governor of Bebue claim they are herdsmen. The Inspector General of police that they are communal clashes. Is it too much to wait and unravel the truth?
Is nomadic pastoralism practised by the Fulani more primitive than nomadic agriculture practiced by the vast majority of the people of Benue and Nigeria? A national challenge cannot be solved in the way and manner of the Benue approach. It just spews  more problems. May be we need to listen to the Governor of Plateau state and other stake holders.
 


On Monday, January 15, 2018, 10:16:35 PM GMT+1, Salimonu Kadiri <ogunlakaiye@hotmail.com> wrote:


Under President Goodluck Jonathan, Nigeria was a Banana Republic where simians held the courts. Under President Muhammadu Buhari, Nigeria is fast degenerating into a Latrine Republic (apology to Trump's shit hole) where maggots rule. President Buhari's visit to Benue would have been a symbolic gesture without any positive effect on the victims and their relatives. Buhari has surrounded himself with callous people. Show me your friend and I will tell you the type of person you are.


In October 2016, the wife of President Buhari, Aisha Buhari alerted the nation about the hijack of her husband's government in a BBC Hausa language broadcast but none of us listened to her. Here follows excerpts from the BBC interview with Mrs. Aisha Buhari.

BBC - Almost two years after President Muhammadu Buhari was elected into this government, it appears as if things are not going on well, the people are complaining: where do you think the problem is?  

Aisha Buhari - .... I think so far so good. The only thing that almost everybody is not happy with, including myself, is on those that really suffered for this journey and now people who do not even have registration cards, are guiding us, which is so unfair and unfortunate for the journey that we started for more than thirteen years ago. People who never knew about APC manifesto, what APC campaigned for and promised the people are in the government. People were just sitting down in their houses, folding their arms only for them to be called to come and head an agency or a ministerial position. They don't have a mission or vision of our APC, you understand what I mean? 


BBC - Whose falt is this?


Aisha Buhari - It's the fault of 15.429 million people because they are the one that brought in the government. It's their fault. They should protest, the 15.429 million that voted for Buhari and APC. 


BBC - As his wife, what will be your advice to him going forward?


Aisha Buhari - My advice is to the whole people that voted for him. They should strengthen the party and who ever is not part of the party should not have control over fifteen point something million people. We are in a democracy, not military era, so we have to play it well and leave a legacy.

Aisha also declared in the interview that if things did not change she would not go out to campaign for her husband in 2019 as she did in 2015. 

When this interview was relayed on BBC, Buhari was on a State visit to Germany where he was confronted to react. In the presence of Chancellor Angela Merkel and her Defence Minister, Ursula Gertrud von der Leyen, both of them women, Buhari drew the locker room joke, my wife belongs to the kitchen, living room and the other room. It was a perfect distraction from the issue of non-elected people that are ruling Nigeria in the name of Buhari. Instead of trouping out in protest to reclaim their mandates for change, Nigerians, especially the intellectuals kept quiet and allowed the old and the new PDP to seize control of the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary in Nigeria.


Some have accused Buhari of being too provincial and nepotic in his appointments to strategic positions, especially, in the presidency, but that should not have mattered if his appointees are competent and nationally orientated in their services to all Nigerians. Judging by certain events that have occurred in Buhari's presidency, there is reason to doubt his mental ability to rule Nigeria. To begin with, President Mohammadu Buhari forwarded the name of Ibrahim Magu to the Senate for confirmation as the substantive Chairman of the EFCC. The DSS, whose Director General is an appointee of the President, and which is an agency under the President sent a letter to the Senate opposing the confirmation of Ibrahim Magu, as a substantive Chairman, on the ground of lacking integrity. The senate, accordingly, refused to confirm the appointment of Magu. President Buhari reacted by asking his Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, to investigate the DSS allegations against Ibrahim Magu. Since the President re-submitted the name of Ibrahim Magu to the Senate, it must be assumed that Malami's report exonerated Magu of the allegations levelled against him by the DSS. Once again, the DSS wrote another report to the Senate to negate President Buhari's recommendation on Magu to the Senate. By standard practice, nominees of the president get security clearance before their names are sent to the National Assembly for confirmation and where the President decides to act against the recommendation of the DSS under him, the latter cannot challenge the President by openly opposing his choice at the National Assembly. When Buhari was on medical vacation, the Acting President, Yemi Osinbajo, said that as long as Buhari is the President and he is vice President, Ibrahim Magu will remain the Head of EFCC. On Magu, the Minister of Justice countered the Acting President, saying Osinbajo is on his own. https://www.premiumtimesng.com/news/headlines/235975-magu-osinbajo-is-on-his-own-attorney-general-malami-says.html. As of date, Magu is still acting Chairman of the EFCC and his traducers, the DSS headed by Lawal Musa Daura and Attorney General Malami are still holding their positions under Buhari. There had been reports where the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, had used the constitutional power confer on him to arbitrarily withdraw cases of corruption being prosecuted in courts by the EFCC. 


In Lagos, at Osborne Towers Ikoyi, the EFCC on 12 April 2017 found the sum of $43.4 million, £27,000, and N23.2 million cash in a four-bedroom apartment located at 16 Osborne Road. It was alleged that the apartment belong to the National Security Adviser to President Buhari, Babagana Monguno. However, the Director General of the National Intelligence Agency, Ayo Oke, claimed that the money belonged to his agency for an undisclosed operation. After a report of an enquiry set up by President Buhari, he suspended Ayo Oke as DG of NIA. Similarly, the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Babachir Lawal was alleged to have awarded his private company a contract to cut grass around internally displaced persons (IDP) camps in Borno for N270 million. Subsequent enquiry proved the allegation right and Babachir Lawal was suspended from office. Both Lawal and Oke were dismissed from office and replaced on the same day.  However, on 21 November 2017, EFCC officials armed with both search and arrest warrants were prevented from arresting former DG of  DSS under Jonathan and DG of NIA, Ayodele Oke, on account of the over $43 million found in a private apartment in Lagos. The President has shown no public interest in the case. 


On 30 August 2017, the Minister of State in the Oil Ministry, Dr. Ibe Kachikwu wrote a secret memo to President Muhammadu Buhari, alleging that the Group Managing Director of Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), Dr. Maikanti Baru, was involved in illegal practices and insubordination. The letter which was leaked to the online media on October 3, 2017, revealed that Dr. Ibe Kachichwu decided to write the memo to the President after all efforts by him to talk to the President face to face were blocked. Until, on and after, 3 October 2017, there was no reaction to Dr. Ibe Kachikwu's memo to the President on how the engine or heart of the Nigerian economy, oil, was being mismanaged. Did the President, who is also the substantive Oil Minister, receive the memo or not? If yes, why did the President keep silent over it? If no, who received the memo in the Presidency and kept it from the sight of the President? Despite the media noise for some days, Buhari did not make any public statement on the memo of his subordinate in the Oil Ministry till date.


Abdul-Rasheed Maina was former Chairman of the Presidential Task Force on Pension Reforms, under President Goodluck Jonathan. He was found culpable with others to have looted the pension fond of billions of dollars during the era of the much regarded docile President Jonathan in 2013. Maina fled the country and Jonathan dismissed him from the service for absent without leave. Suddenly, Abdul-Rasheed Maina was recalled and reinstated into the civil service and posted to the Ministry of Interior as Assistant Director from 28 September 2017. When the Premium Times in Nigeria blew out this news, it was discovered that the Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami; Minister of Interior, Abdul-Rahman Dambazu; Chief of Staff to the President, Abba Kyari; and Director General of DSS, Lawal Musa Daura masterminded not only Maina's recall and reinstatement into the service but also offered him SSS-police protection. Buhari ordered immediate dismissal of Maina who disappeared from the country under the purview of the DSS despite the fact that the EFCC had declared him wanted for billion dollars fraud from the pension funds. The facilitators of Maina's escape are still in office around Buhari who came to power under the promise of change and fighting corruption.


In a resent interview in Sahara Reporters, a 92-year-old, Alhaji Tanko Yakasai said among other things, "I believe there are five important ingredients necessary for successful political leadership, and these include capacity, competence, vision, planning and integrity. In my opinion, our present national leadership is totally lacking those ingredients. All of them are inherent, they cannot be bought or borrowed...." Tanko Yakasai observation about Buhari, if true, may be a consolation for those of us who are disappointed about the outcome of his regime so far. The most tragic thing about the herdsmen in Nigeria is not just the killings in Benue but that there are academics who defend nomadic pastoralism as constitutionally guaranteed freedom of movement in the 21st century while they themselves will not accept freedom to live in mud houses with thatched roofs equipped with clay pots and jugs serving as water coolers and reservoirs. In his book titled : The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa, published in 1922, the first Governor General of British Colonised Nigeria, Frederick John Dealtry Lugard wrote, "He (the African Negro) lacks power of organisation and is conspicuously deficient in the management and control alike of men or of business. He loves the display of power, but fails to realise its responsibility. ....//... He has the courage of the fighting animal - an instinct rather than a moral virtue (p. 69-70)." Looking at Nigeria's leaders today we must regret that his recorded observations on the qualities of Black Africans are correct. 

S. Kadiri



 




Från:usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com<usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> för Toyin Falola <toyinfalola@austin.utexas.edu>
Skickat: den 12 januari 2018 20:07
Till: dialogue
Ämne: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Buhari's son and Benue's sons
 

If President Buhari can take his son to Germany for health treatment (no one's son should die, before anyone misinterprets me), I need to be educated why President Buhari cannot visit Benue State to empathize (lower than sympathize) with those who have lost their own sons and daughters.

Am I naïve?

Is governance not about caring for the collective people of a nation?

Moderator

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

USA Africa Dialogue Series - Fw: REFORMING OUR DYSFUNCTIONAL POLITICAL PARTIES

$
0
0


Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Femi Babatunde <ofemibabatunde@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, 18 January 2018 14:25
To: Ayo Olukotun
Subject: REFORMING OUR DYSFUNCTIONAL POLITICAL PARTIES

REFORMING OUR DYSFUNCTIONAL POLITICAL PARTIES


By Ayo Olukotun

 

Less than three weeks into the new year, Nigerians remain very much in the wake of the sad and disempowering events which punctured optimistic hopes and wishes for happier, or at least less woeful year than 2017. The picturesque queues for fuel have reduced in size in most cities, although they linger in Abuja and a few other cities. Also, a raw upbeat mood persists in the aftermath of the mass killings of farmers and others by Fulani herdsmen presumably in the bid to assure what the Nation columnist, Gbenga Omotosho recently termed "better life for cows".

 

On the cheerful side, inflation, though in double digits, has dipped a little, while the price of oil in the world market has drifted upwards to $70 per barrel. Amidst all of these, preparations for the elections of 2018 and 2019 continue feverishly, necessitating a focus of the current state of our political parties. The zeroing in on the parties is even more warranted in the light of the registration in December by the Independent Electoral Commission of 21 new parties, bringing the total number of political parties up to 67. INEC has assured that there are prospects of registering 80 more parties, since it is considering a deluge of applications for new parties. Obviously, this follows a characteristic Nigerian pattern in which a noble idea is devalued or rendered virtually meaningless by being stretched to an illogical or absurd limit. For, while those who scale the INEC hurdle for registration may rejoice in the exercise of their fundamental rights, it is difficult to see how a plethora of groups or associations, lacking political identity and fronting as parties can bring anything more than comic relief to a political table cluttered with meaningless eccentricities as well as much style without substance. It is also possible that political parties are deliberately allowed to mushroom in order to increase the power of the ruling party in the first instance, and secondarily, the main opposition party.

 

The theatre of multiplying parties without platforms constitutes a parable of the shallowness and lack of credibility of our party system replete with party switching by politicians across board. Only a few weeks ago, the nation was treated to a comedy when on the floor of the upper legislative chamber, the Peoples Democratic Party physically prevented Senator Sunny Ogbuoji, representing Ebonyin South Senatorial District, from switching over to the ruling All Progressive Party. The resulting commotion is typical of the bedlam which accompanies frequent party switches back and forth by our politicians. The root problem is that party members, however new, are supposed to be bound together by a minimum charter of governance ideas, which define their political niches. In our situation, it is difficult to find this common thread, since the so-called manifestoes of our parties are written by consultants who espouse the same political clichés, which party members do not even bother to read.

 

So, the question that haunts our fragile parties is: who is a party man in a context where politicians, including holders of high office can jettison their parties at the slightest whiff of disagreement. This columnist does not intend to suggest that party switching is idiosyncratic to the Nigerian polity. Even the United States harbors its share of famous party switchers, including Hillary Clinton, who crossed from the Republican party to the Democratic party, and President Donald Trump, who has changed parties for not less than four times.

 

The point to note, however, is that while politicians the world over are basically opportunists, and power-mongers, the Nigerian political firmament is distinguished by the pervasive cynicism, the lack of gravitas and the crowding-out of time-honoured virtues by settling for slippery shortcuts. Before developing the narrative further, I crave the indulgence of the reader for the digression of a short-take.

 

In the aftermath of the notorious and racist put-down of African countries by Trump, Nigeria can justifiably take pride in the achievements of some of its sons and daughters abroad. Every generation produces its own share of Nigerian professionals of world-class forte and stature. Among the most eminent, is Mr. Emeka Anyaoku, a former Secretary General of the Commonwealth, who turned 85 yesterday. Anyaoku made a name for himself and for Nigeria during thirty eventful years at the Commonwealth, which included a two-term tenure of five years each as the Secretary General. Holder of 33 honorary doctorates of top universities across the globe, the diplomat will be remembered for his contribution to the transition in South Africa to a post apartheid polity, and for such innovations as the Commonwealth Observer Group to elections in Commonwealth Countries. Characteristic of a plethora of recognition is the institution by the University of London of an Emeka Anyaoku Professorial Chair at the University's Institute for Commonwealth Studies. Although he appeared not to have been successful in brokering peace in Nigeria in the years following the June 12 debacle, he has continued to be a steadying voice and presence in Nigeria's turbulent journey to democratic consolidation. It is appropriate that in his elder years, he continues to intervene in public discourse, for example, by his tireless advocacy of restructuring, and he is easily the conscience of a nation adrift. This columnist wishes an elder statesman a Happy Birthday.

 

To return to the initial discourse on our political parties, it is necessary to state that the evolution of our political parties into the support pillars and arteries of our democracy should include their reinvention to become centres of agenda-setting policy discourse, which can provide alternatives to those being currently implemented, serving as incubators for future political leaders, bridging the gap between the rulers and the ruled, as well as facilitating a culture of consensus and nation-building. What we have currently are a far cry from these projections, which constitute the cardinal attributes of credible political parties the world over.

 

As the case of the French President, Emmanuel Macron shows, a newly formed political party, En-marche, can within a short time seize the nation's imagination and capture political power. But, it cannot do so without a platform, a body of political ideas around which a movement or a political party, properly so-called can coalesce. It would be important, therefore, both for the newly registered parties and the established ones, to spend time working on their agreed policy perspectives and beliefs. They should also ensure that party conventions, as happens, in the United Kingdom, are dedicated, at least once a year, to fleshing-out the enduring principles and points of departure around which the party is built. The present situation, where parties hold conventions only to decide positions based on zoning or federal character is encouraging mediocrity, ethnicity and money politics. The other point to consider is how to make the parties inclusive, participatory and genuinely democratic, as opposed to what obtains currently, where parties are dominated by cabals and barons who have access to state resources. Obviously, parties lacking in internal democracy cannot be the laboratory or the pilot test site for diffusing democratic values.

Finally, a law is required following the example of Russia the outlawing, with a few exceptions the switching of parties, which signals in its pervasiveness the ill-health of our political parties.

 

*Olukotun is the Oba (Dr.) Sikiru Adetona Professorial Chair of Governance at the Department of Political Science, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago Iwoye.



Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - Article: Lessons From Yoruba Cultural Strategy

$
0
0
CAO,

This is the utmost public display of affection.  How much money do you earn from this purely public spirited service?  Nothing!

So why do you place upon yourself the very huge burden to fact check all that is written and you place on your blog?  That is humanly impossible.

Simply put a caveat that all you publish remain the responsibility of those who write them.

Simple and quiet.

Cheers.


IBK

Sent from my iPhone

On 18 Jan 2018, at 8:12 AM, Oluwatoyin Vincent Adepoju <toyin.adepoju@gmail.com> wrote:

The expression referred to in the essay may be better understood as metaphorical than literal.

Abiola's being cheated is often cited as the reason why OBJ was chosen by the PDP in order to placate the Yoruba, Abiola's ethnicity, even though the Yoruba people might not have identified with that decision by the political elite.

toyin

On 17 January 2018 at 17:53, Chidi Anthony Opara <chidi.opara@gmail.com> wrote:
Lawyer IBK,
You mean that if Professor Nwala's article, sent to and published by a blog I edit and publish, had contained portions considered seditious or libellous or both, that I would not have been held responsible in some ways?

You are always friendly to me in private, but would not miss any opportunity to put me down publicly.

Well, continue, it does not bother me. It is your problem not mine. Only you can help yourself.

I have at least given you the attention you have been dying for. Good day.

CAO.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

USA Africa Dialogue Series - PRESS RELEASE Passage of PIGB: CISLAC commends the House, calls for the passage of other outstanding PIG Bills

$
0
0

PRESS RELEASE


Passage of PIGB: CISLAC commends the House, calls for the passage of other outstanding PIG Bills


The Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) commends the House of Representatives for the recent passage of the much awaited Petroleum Industry and Governance Bill (PIGB).


While we welcome and applaud the passage, we find such development worthy of commendation as it will to appreciable extent promote transparency, accountability and governance, as well as curtail monumental financial losses in our nation's oil and gas sector.


We are not unaware that the passage, which aimed primarily at the restructuring and reformation of the nation's oil and gas sector has set the pace unbundling of the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) to establishing independence agency for effective operationalization and regulation of the sector and merger of its subsidiaries into an entity for appropriate supervision and coordination. 


We recall that both the House and the Senate passed the PIGB for a second reading in June 2017 after which the leadership of the House set up the ad hoc committee headed by Chief Whip of the House, Hon. Al-hassan Ado Doguwa, to conduct Public Hearing for stakeholders' inputs to fine tune the bill.


We are pleased that the passage is in line with overarching recommendations made by CISLAC during an engagement with the House's Ad hoc Committee on PIGB in October 2017 with subsequent commitments by the Committee to get it passed—along with other outstanding PIG Bills, before the end of their tenure. We believe this passage comes in fulfilment of the commitments.


Considering other outstanding Bills that are paramount to the existence and composition of PIGB such as those related to the host communities and fiscal issues in the sector that have passed through second reading in the House, we call for sustain efforts and commitments to fast-track their passage.  


We understand that with this development, the PIGB has approached a stage awaiting consideration for appropriate harmonisation with that of the Senate to sail the adopted version for Presidential assent.  


We call on both Chambers of the National Assembly to hold a Joint Session to accelerate the harmonisation process of the two versions passed for timely Presidential assent. 


We also commend the civil society groups, media and other stakeholders for their persistent engagements to ensure the passage and assent to the PIGB is brought to the limelight.  


Signed:

Auwal Ibrahim Musa (Rafsanjani)

Executive Director, CISLAC

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

USA Africa Dialogue Series - News Release: Unlawful Detention Of Tim Elombah Using Modified Anti Press Decree 4 Of 1984 (Cyber Stalking): IGP Ibrahim Idris Has Crossed The Redlines Of His Constitutional Powers Requiring His Sack

$
0
0
Link:
http://chidioparareports.blogspot.com.ng/2018/01/news-release-unlawful-detention-of-tim.html

From chidi opara reports


chidi opara reports is published as a social service by PublicInformationProjects

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Viewing all 53856 articles
Browse latest View live